2009
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antitumor Activity of GSK1904529A, a Small-molecule Inhibitor of the Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Receptor Tyrosine Kinase

Abstract: Purpose: Dysregulation of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) signaling pathway has been implicated in the development of many types of tumors, including prostate, colon, breast, pancreatic, ovarian, and sarcomas. Agents that inhibit IGF-IR activity may be useful in treatment of patients with various cancers. Experimental Design: Kinase assays were used to identify a selective small-molecule inhibitor of IGF-IR activity. The effects of this compound on IGF-IR signaling, cell proliferation, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transient increase in blood glucose, especially in the glucose tolerance test, clearly suggests the perturbation of insulin signaling. Similar results were observed with the structurally distinct IGF-IR/IR inhibitors GSK1904529A (22) and NVP-AEW541 (24). The increase in insulin levels provides a potential explanation for the minimal change in blood glucose; however, the sustained hyperinsulinemia in mice treated for 23 days, compared with 8 days, suggests that caution is warranted with chronic dosing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transient increase in blood glucose, especially in the glucose tolerance test, clearly suggests the perturbation of insulin signaling. Similar results were observed with the structurally distinct IGF-IR/IR inhibitors GSK1904529A (22) and NVP-AEW541 (24). The increase in insulin levels provides a potential explanation for the minimal change in blood glucose; however, the sustained hyperinsulinemia in mice treated for 23 days, compared with 8 days, suggests that caution is warranted with chronic dosing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…A structurally distinct IGF-IR-selective inhibitor previously described, GSK1904529A, showed similar potent activity against IGF-IR and IR, but lacked activity against ALK (21,22). Both compounds inhibited IGF-IR signaling in cells, although GSK1904529A seemed to be more potent than GSK1838705A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Increased expression of IGF-1, IGF-2 and/or their corresponding receptor, IGF-1R, has been shown in a broad range of tumors and increased levels of circulating IGF-1 are associated with colon, prostate, breast, lung, and bladder cancers (5,7). Given its pleiotropic role in these tumor types, several approaches have been taken to inhibit IGF-1R signaling, including RNA antisense (8,9), anti-IGF-1R-blocking antibodies (10), dominant-negative IGF-1R (11), and small-molecule inhibitors (12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also demonstrate in the Met1 ERa low luminal B breast cancer model that, despite enhanced serum insulin levels, reduced circulating levels of IGF1 decrease Akt signaling (pAkt and cyclin D1) and EMT and chemokine gene expression, all of which regulate tumor growth, progression, and/or metastatic potential in other cancer models (Ahmad et al 1999, Mira et al 1999, 2001, Akekawatchai et al 2005, Singh et al 2009, Wu et al 2010, Durfort et al 2012. Pharmacological inhibitors of the IGF1 pathway effectively diminish breast tumor growth in several preclinical models of breast cancer (Maloney et al 2003, Haluska et al 2006, Gualberto & Pollak 2009, Sabbatini et al 2009, Sun et al 2011. Unfortunately, clinical application has been limited by safety concerns (Gualberto & Pollak 2009) and efficacy due to high phosphorylation of IGF1/insulin receptors in all breast cancer subtypes (Law et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%