2014
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.8103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antitumor activity of alectinib (CH5424802/RO5424802) for ALK-rearranged NSCLC with or without prior crizotinib treatment in bioequivalence study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model predicts that if alectinib is dosed within 160 min of the start of a meal, the steady state C max and area under the curve (AUC) will be approximately 80% of the value of a dose given after 30 min. The simulations are consistent with observed patient PK data for alectinib, which showed that steady state C max and AUC did not differ more than 20% following administration within 30 min after a meal or with fasting 2 h before and 1 h after administration [24]. Furthermore, the prediction for the late fed state with dosing up to 240 min after food is that the AUC and C max are reduced to 70 and 60% of the 30-min values, respectively.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Effect Of Time Of Dosing Relative To Food Intakesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The model predicts that if alectinib is dosed within 160 min of the start of a meal, the steady state C max and area under the curve (AUC) will be approximately 80% of the value of a dose given after 30 min. The simulations are consistent with observed patient PK data for alectinib, which showed that steady state C max and AUC did not differ more than 20% following administration within 30 min after a meal or with fasting 2 h before and 1 h after administration [24]. Furthermore, the prediction for the late fed state with dosing up to 240 min after food is that the AUC and C max are reduced to 70 and 60% of the 30-min values, respectively.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Effect Of Time Of Dosing Relative To Food Intakesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Also, the place of the second and third generation TKI's (EGFR: afatinib, AZD9291, CO-1686, ALK: ceritinib, alectinib) should be determined as these agents have a better penetration in the CSF compared to first generation TKI's and cranial responses are found with these agents in patients who develop brain metastases when they have already been treated with first generation TKI [15,[60][61][62]. Another option that could be explored in this patient population is the use of SRS without WBRT, even for multiple (five to ten) brain metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual effects and gastrointestinal disorders (diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea) were rare. During a phase I study there were an ORR of 60% and good safety profile in patients who are refractory to crizotinib (96): for this reason, a singlearm phase I/II study in crizotinib resistant patients is ongoing (NCT01801111). There is also an ongoing phase III trial comparing alectinib versus crizotinib in advanced NSCLC (NCT02075840).…”
Section: "Second Generation" Alk Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%