1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990719)82:2<226::aid-ijc13>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antitumor activity and novel DNA-self-strand-breaking mechanism of CNDAC (1-(2-C-cyano-2-deoxy-?-d-ARABINO-Pentofuranosyl) cytosine) and itsN4-palmitoyl derivative (CS-682)

Abstract: We have studied the antitumor activity and the novel DNA‐self‐strand‐breaking mechanism of CNDAC (1‐(2‐C‐cyano‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐arabino‐pentofuranosyl)cytosine) and its N4‐palmitoyl derivative (CS‐682). In vitro, CS‐682 showed strong cytotoxicity against human tumor cells comparable with that of CNDAC; both compounds displayed a similar broad spectrum. In vivo, however, orally administered CS‐682 showed a more potent activity against human tumor xenografts than CNDAC, 5′‐deoxy‐5‐fluorouridine, 5‐fluorouracil and 2′… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have demonstrated that sapacitabine also had cytotoxic activity against a broad spectrum of human tumour cells, and although the average cytotoxicities were comparable with CNDAC, sapacitabine was more potent (Hanaoka et al, 1999). In gastric, lung, mammary, colon, ovary and epidermoid cell lines, the IC 50 values for sapacitabine ranged from 0.1 to 11 mM, whereas for CNDAC they ranged from 0.1 to 4350 mM (Azuma et al, 1993;Hanaoka et al, 1999;Matsuda and Sasaki, 2004). Figure 5 Correlation between mRNA levels and sensitivity to deoxycytidine analogues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors have demonstrated that sapacitabine also had cytotoxic activity against a broad spectrum of human tumour cells, and although the average cytotoxicities were comparable with CNDAC, sapacitabine was more potent (Hanaoka et al, 1999). In gastric, lung, mammary, colon, ovary and epidermoid cell lines, the IC 50 values for sapacitabine ranged from 0.1 to 11 mM, whereas for CNDAC they ranged from 0.1 to 4350 mM (Azuma et al, 1993;Hanaoka et al, 1999;Matsuda and Sasaki, 2004). Figure 5 Correlation between mRNA levels and sensitivity to deoxycytidine analogues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, data have suggested that the sapacitabine cytotoxicity profile may differ from that of other nucleoside analogues (Kaneko et al, 1997;Faivre et al, 1999;Hanaoka et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 1999;Wu et al, 2003;Matsuda and Sasaki, 2004). Therefore, further investigations are required to ascertain the exact mechanism of action of sapacitabine, to evaluate the toxicity of combinations with other compounds and to screen the range of its activity in various tumour systems that may eventually lead to clinical application.…”
Section: Sapacitabine (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 2Ј-deoxycytidine analogue (22) has been shown to inhibit tumor growth by both inhibiting DNA polymerase and by inducing DNA self-strand breakage through incorporation of an active metabolite into the strands (23). Oral CS-682 has been shown to possess potent cytotoxic activity against several tumor cell lines in vitro and in vivo (23) and has been demonstrated to inhibit the development of liver metastasis (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 2Ј-deoxycytidine analogue (22) has been shown to inhibit tumor growth by both inhibiting DNA polymerase and by inducing DNA self-strand breakage through incorporation of an active metabolite into the strands (23). Oral CS-682 has been shown to possess potent cytotoxic activity against several tumor cell lines in vitro and in vivo (23) and has been demonstrated to inhibit the development of liver metastasis (24). We have reported the efficacy of this agent in inhibiting growth and dissemination of pancreatic cancer in an orthotopic model and demonstrated that this ability may be caused by a direct inhibitory effect on the development of metastases (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transportation within cells and hydrolysis of sapacitabine lead to the formation of the active compound 1-[2-C-cyano-2-deoxy-β-D-arabino-pentafuranosyl]cytosine) (CNDAC). [1][2][3] Among antimetabolite drugs, CNDAC has a unique antitumor mechanism, in that it causes DNA singlestrand breaks through a β-elimination rearrangement after incorporation into the DNA during the first replication. 4,5) A preclinical study showed that both CNDAC and sapacitabine were effective antitumor nucleosides against various solid tumors such as those of the stomach, colon, and lung.…”
Section: Improvement Of the Antitumor Activity Of Poorly Soluble Sapamentioning
confidence: 99%