1950
DOI: 10.1042/bj0470077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antithyroid substances. 1. The mercaptoglyoxalines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1955
1955
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stanley and Astwood (1947), using in vivo counting and singledose technique, have assayed drugs for antithyroid activity in man. However, there has been little work on the correlation of results obtained using single or repeated doses and there is a general assumption that comparable results may be obtained by either method (Searle et al, 1950). The results of the present investigation on thiohydantoins do not support this assumption.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Stanley and Astwood (1947), using in vivo counting and singledose technique, have assayed drugs for antithyroid activity in man. However, there has been little work on the correlation of results obtained using single or repeated doses and there is a general assumption that comparable results may be obtained by either method (Searle et al, 1950). The results of the present investigation on thiohydantoins do not support this assumption.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Searle et al (1950), using the single-dose technique, did not find any increase of activity with 4-alkyl substitution on 2-mercaptoglyoxaline, and they compared this with the results obtained by Astwood et al (1945) on chronic testing. Searle et al (1950) do not appear to have studied dose/response curves with all their 4-alkyl derivatives. It is possible that varying rates of metabolism or excretion may account for differences found between singledose testing and more chronic administration of compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations