“…The selection pressure predicted using the FUBAR method performed separately for each group indicated four distinct DRM sites under positive selection pressure, including DRM site 138 in the ART-naïve group, DRM site 188 in the ART-experienced group, and DRM sites 103 and 115 in the unknown status group, while all other DRM sites were under negative selection. Further analysis of DRM sites between the 3 groups showed DRM sites 69, 101, 179, 184, and 190 (−0.99, −0.95, −0.97, −0.93, and −0.99, respectively) to be under high negative selection pressure in the ART-naïve group; DRM sites 10, 30,41,54,65,100,101,190,221, and 230 (−1.00, −1.00, −0.94, −0.99, −0.97, −0.99, −0.87, −0.99, −0.95, and −0.93, respectively) to be under high negative selection pressure in the ART-experienced group; while DRM sites 46, 47, 54, 106, and 138 (−0.95, −0.90, −0.99, −0.99, and −0.98, respectively) to be under high negative selection pressure in the unknown status group. Moreover, DRM site 103 was observed under positive selection in the ART-experienced group (Supplementary Table S1).…”