Proceedings of Sixth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. ISSRE'95
DOI: 10.1109/issre.1995.497647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antirandom testing: getting the most out of black-box testing

Abstract: Random testing is a well known concept that requires that each test is selected randomly regardless of the test previously applied. This paper introduces the concept of antirandom testing. In this testing strategy each test applied is chosen such that its total distance from all previous tests is maximum. Two distance measures are de ned. Procedures to construct antirandom sequences are developed. A checkpoint encoding scheme is introduced that allows automatic generation of e cient test cases. Further develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
81
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This information consists of the previous tests applied [14]. Therefore the new approach called Antirandom Testing (AT) was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This information consists of the previous tests applied [14]. Therefore the new approach called Antirandom Testing (AT) was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the new approach called Antirandom Testing (AT) was proposed. In this case each test pattern is chosen such that its total distance from all previous patterns is maximum [14,25,26]. Distance is a measure of how different two test patterns T i and T j are [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are many testing techniques discussed in the literature that can be termed black-box testing 6,8,9,13,20 . Random testing 8 chooses tests randomly based on some input distribution, without attempting to exploit information gained by tests applied earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%