1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02246146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antipsychotic agents antagonize non-competitiveN-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist-induced behaviors

Abstract: Antipsychotic agents were tested for their ability to antagonize both dopaminergic-induced and non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist-induced behaviors. All of the agents dose-dependently antagonized the apomorphine-induced climbing mouse assay (CMA) and dizocilpine (MK-801)-induced locomotion and falling assay (MK-801-LF) with a CMA/MK-801-LF ratio of less than or equal to 1.6. However, clozapine and its structural analog olanzapine more potently antagonized MK-801-LF (1.1 and 0.05 mg/kg) than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
131
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
15
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the behavioral deficits in these paradigms are produced by acute (t-maze) and repeated (social interaction) administration of PCP, both of which have merits as screens for putative antipsychotics. The predictive validity of these behavioral deficits in identifying antipsychotic efficacy is evident from studies showing that existing medications that are at least partially effective in treating cognitive deficits and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in humans also interfere with these behaviors in rodents (Faltus et al, 1973;Hauber, 1993;Breier et al, 1994;Corbett et al, 1995;Sams-Dodd, 1999). Consistent with earlier findings, these data indicate that PCP produces deficits in t-maze performance and social withdrawal (Moghaddam and Adams, 1998;Sams-Dodd, 1999).…”
Section: N-acetylcysteine Reversal Of Psychotomimetic Effects Of Pcpsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the behavioral deficits in these paradigms are produced by acute (t-maze) and repeated (social interaction) administration of PCP, both of which have merits as screens for putative antipsychotics. The predictive validity of these behavioral deficits in identifying antipsychotic efficacy is evident from studies showing that existing medications that are at least partially effective in treating cognitive deficits and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in humans also interfere with these behaviors in rodents (Faltus et al, 1973;Hauber, 1993;Breier et al, 1994;Corbett et al, 1995;Sams-Dodd, 1999). Consistent with earlier findings, these data indicate that PCP produces deficits in t-maze performance and social withdrawal (Moghaddam and Adams, 1998;Sams-Dodd, 1999).…”
Section: N-acetylcysteine Reversal Of Psychotomimetic Effects Of Pcpsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Similar to t-maze performance, this paradigm has predictive validity in that negative symptoms linked to schizophrenia or repeated PCP-induced behavioral deficits that are used to model these symptoms are at least partially responsive to clozapine (Breier et al, 1994;Corbett et al, 1995;Sams-Dodd, 1999). Social withdrawal was evident as a reduction in the amount of time that two unfamiliar rats spent in close proximity when treated with PCP (3 mg/kg, SC) relative to saline ( Figure 5).…”
Section: N-acetylcysteine Attenuates Pcp-evoked Social Withdrawalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of clozapine to attenuate MK-801-evoked change in cortical 5-HT may be related to its superior effects in negative/cognitive symptoms. Actually, clozapine but not haloperidol effectively blocks the hyperactivity, metabolic activation, neurotoxic cell damage, as well as the deficits in prepulse inhibition and social interaction induced by NMDA receptor antagonists (Corbett et al, 1995;Gleason and Shannon, 1997;Abi-Saab et al, 1998;Duncan et al, 1998;Olney et al, 1999;Geyer et al, 2001;Farber et al, 2006). Further research is needed to ascertain the transmitter receptors responsible for such differences between clozapine and haloperidol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raclopride, a potent and selective dopamine D 2 receptor antagonist (Lahti et al, 1993;Kohler et al, 1985), was used to probe the classic mechanism of action of first-generation antipsychotics relying on D 2 dopamine blockade. The contribution of dopamine to the psychotogenic action of PCP is still the subject of debate, with the literature showing inconsistent effects of dopamine D 2 blockers in rodents (Idris et al, 2005;Linn et al, 2003;Duncan et al, 1998a;Corbett et al, 1995) and humans (Krystal et al, 1999), despite evidence of altered dopamine release following NMDAR antagonist administration . The effect of raclopride was compared with that of clozapine, a prototypical new-generation antipsychotic that, in addition to blocking dopamine D 2 receptors, possesses multiple antagonistic actions at several other receptors (Meltzer, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%