2016
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.146654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiplatelet therapy versus observation in low-risk essential thrombocythemia with a CALR mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
3
112
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In a retrospective study evaluating nonpregnant patients, patients with the CALR mutation had excessive bleeding and no reduction in thrombotic risk with ASA for primary prevention. 44 It is reassuring that the number of bleeding events in the antepartum and postpartum periods is comparable or lower with the total bleeding rates reported in randomized trials evaluating prophylactic LMWH and ASA during pregnancy or in the postpartum period in women without ET. [45][46][47][48] It is further reassurance that there was no antepartum bleeding reported in women with ET who received a combination of ASA and LMWH during their pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In a retrospective study evaluating nonpregnant patients, patients with the CALR mutation had excessive bleeding and no reduction in thrombotic risk with ASA for primary prevention. 44 It is reassuring that the number of bleeding events in the antepartum and postpartum periods is comparable or lower with the total bleeding rates reported in randomized trials evaluating prophylactic LMWH and ASA during pregnancy or in the postpartum period in women without ET. [45][46][47][48] It is further reassurance that there was no antepartum bleeding reported in women with ET who received a combination of ASA and LMWH during their pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study are difficult to interpret because: i) the proportion of patients treated with antiplatelet therapy in CALR - vs JAK2 -mutated patients is unknown, ii) a multivariable model for risk of bleeding was not reported, and iii) cytoreduction was started much earlier in CALR - vs. JAK2 -mutated patients mostly to control the higher platelet count. 103 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent retrospective study has shown that in patients with low-risk CALR-mutant ET, low-dose aspirin does not reduce the risk of thrombosis and may increase the risk of bleeding. 42 This observation suggests a genotype-based approach to antiplatelet therapy in low-risk patients, and observation alone appears a reasonable option for those with CALR-mutant ET without concomitant cardiovascular risk factors and without microvascular symptoms.…”
Section: Distinguishing Familial Et From Hereditary Thrombocytosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,40,41 A more recent work has evaluated the benefit-to-risk ratio of low-dose aspirin in 433 low-risk ET patients who were on antiplatelet therapy or observation only. 42 In JAK2 (V617F)-mutated patients, low-dose aspirin was associated with a reduced incidence of venous thrombosis with no effect on the risk of bleeding. By contrast, in CALR-mutated patients, antiplatelet therapy did not affect the risk of thrombosis whereas it was associated with a higher incidence of bleeding.…”
Section: How We Treat Patients With Et According To Their Individual mentioning
confidence: 99%