2016
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiplatelet therapy and outcome in patients undergoing surgery following coronary stenting: Results of the surgery after stenting registry

Abstract: The results of this registry demonstrate the safety and feasibility of applying a national consensus document on the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in stented patients undergoing surgery. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk prediction models, such as the CHADS 2 score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke [double weight]), have been assessed in a perioperative setting but in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom the assessment was for stroke prediction and not acute coronary events. 23 Risk stratification should be individualized so as to consider the following factors 24 : 1) time interval from stent implantation to surgery; 2) type of surgery (cardiovascular vs noncardiovascular site, bleeding risk); 3) stent characteristics (location, length, diameter); 4) other patient characteristics (prior acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, peripheral arterial disease, smoking). Of these factors, the type of surgery is an overlooked but important determinant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk prediction models, such as the CHADS 2 score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke [double weight]), have been assessed in a perioperative setting but in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom the assessment was for stroke prediction and not acute coronary events. 23 Risk stratification should be individualized so as to consider the following factors 24 : 1) time interval from stent implantation to surgery; 2) type of surgery (cardiovascular vs noncardiovascular site, bleeding risk); 3) stent characteristics (location, length, diameter); 4) other patient characteristics (prior acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, peripheral arterial disease, smoking). Of these factors, the type of surgery is an overlooked but important determinant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,25,31,32 In this setting, a strategy of temporary transition with a potent and effective intravenous antiplatelet agent with a predictable and safe interruption of platelet inhibition may represent an appropriate treatment option. [4][5][6] Currently, the only intravenous antiplatelet agents available for clinical use and potentially usable for bridging include cangrelor and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI). However, cangrelor is a more attractive agent for bridging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these two studies, ACC/AHA 2014 guidelines and 2016 focused update commented that elective noncardiac surgery after DES implantation may be considered after 180 days 3 , 4 . Rossini and colleagues 23 performed an analysis of multicenter, prospective registry of 1082 patients with previous coronary stent insertion. Surgeries performed within 180 days from PCI were associated with net-adverse clinical events, but not with MACE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixthly, the definition of bleeding outcome may influence our results. The definition of major bleeding from the POISE-2 trial may not be a broadly accepted scale and using another scale may lead to different results 23 , 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%