2020
DOI: 10.3233/jpd-191824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiparkinsonian Effects of a Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 4 Agonist in MPTP-Treated Marmosets

Abstract: Background: Increased firing across glutamatergic synapses may contribute to both the motor dysfunction and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia seen in Parkinson's disease. Given their ability to reduce glutamate release, activation of group III metabotropic glutamate receptors such as metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 may prove effective against both motor dysfunction and dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. Objectives: We hypothesised that activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 by an orthosteric agonist ((2S)-2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes N ‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) antagonists (MK‐801 or memantine), α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) antagonists (perampanel), and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 (mGlu5) allosteric modulators (mavoglurant). None of these development programs has succeeded so far 14,24‐26 . This might be explained by limitations in study designs, inadequate dosages, or inappropriate therapeutic windows to achieve efficacy without unacceptable adverse reactions 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes N ‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) antagonists (MK‐801 or memantine), α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) antagonists (perampanel), and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 (mGlu5) allosteric modulators (mavoglurant). None of these development programs has succeeded so far 14,24‐26 . This might be explained by limitations in study designs, inadequate dosages, or inappropriate therapeutic windows to achieve efficacy without unacceptable adverse reactions 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these development programs has succeeded so far. 14,[24][25][26] This might be explained by limitations in study designs, inadequate dosages, or inappropriate therapeutic windows to achieve efficacy without unacceptable adverse reactions. 27 However, the negative findings of the present trial, targeting another glutamate mechanism, namely, the mGLu4 receptors, further challenges the glutamate hypothesis for the treatment of PD, reinforcing the concept that the unique effects of amantadine in this disease might be attributed to mechanisms beyond its NMDA blocking effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the anti-dyskinetic effects of foliglurax reported by Charvin et al are of great interest not only because of the effect size but also because of the previous reports where activation of mGluR4 (by agonists or PAMs) did not inhibit severity of the already established L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in rodents (Table 3) [65][66][67]. Interestingly, a recently published study in marmosets also failed to detect any anti-dyskinetic effects of the mGluR4 agonist LSP1-2111 [68].…”
Section: Preclinical Efficacy Studiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In primate studies, a similarly mixed picture has emerged. While the mGlu 4 PAM, foliglurax (formerly PXT002331), reduced expression of established LID in MPTP-treated macaques [ 18 ], LSP1-2111 failed to reduce established AIMs in the MPTP-treated common marmoset [ 19 ]. Nevertheless, a recently published report found that ADX88188, while failing to reduce global LID, did reduce the severity of peak dose dyskinesia in marmosets [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%