2015
DOI: 10.3136/fstr.21.695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antioxidant Properties of Tripeptides Revealed by a Comparison of Six Different Assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activity of LWC was highest (5296.8 μMTE) and was 3800‐fold higher than the lowest activity of EHV (1.4 μMTE). Thus, as reported previously, the strength of antioxidant activity of tripeptides depended on the constituent amino acids . In addition, even if the constituent amino acids of peptides were the same, their activity depended on the amino acid sequence; for instance, LFC (1780.3 μMTE) compared with CLF (434.8 μMTE) and WDY (390.6 μMTE) compared with DYW (131.0 μMTE).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activity of LWC was highest (5296.8 μMTE) and was 3800‐fold higher than the lowest activity of EHV (1.4 μMTE). Thus, as reported previously, the strength of antioxidant activity of tripeptides depended on the constituent amino acids . In addition, even if the constituent amino acids of peptides were the same, their activity depended on the amino acid sequence; for instance, LFC (1780.3 μMTE) compared with CLF (434.8 μMTE) and WDY (390.6 μMTE) compared with DYW (131.0 μMTE).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The majority of HAT‐based assays apply a competitive reaction in which the antioxidant and substrates compete for thermally generated peroxyl radicals, including the oxygen radical absorbance capacity and total radical trapping antioxidant parameter assays. Because the antioxidant activity assays are based on different chemical reactions, a tested sample can exhibit different antioxidant activities depending on the assay used …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With decreasing pH, the equilibrium protonation of the carbonyl oxygen increases, increasing the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon [51]. The occurrence of the deactivating protonated amino group and radical stabilizing clusters on side chains accounted for the positional selectivity and rates of radical assault on peptides [52]. As the pH was raised, the DPPH • scavenging activity declined marginally at pH 6-10 and increased at pH 11-13.…”
Section: Metal Chelating Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With decreasing pH, the equilibrium protonation of the carbonyl oxygen increases, increasing the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon (Sun et al ., 2020). The occurrence of the deactivating protonated amino group and radical stabilising clusters on side chains accounted for the positional selectivity and degrees of radical assault on peptides (Ohashi et al ., 2015). As the pH raised, the DPPH • scavenging activity increased at pH 5–7, decreased marginally at pH 7–10 and decreased dramatically at pH 10–14.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%