2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antioxidant function of phytocannabinoids: Molecular basis of their stability and cytoprotective properties under UV-irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, utilizing the ABTS (2,2 -Azino-bis (3-Ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulfonic Acid)) cell-free antioxidant assay, Dawidowicz et al showed that CBG is slightly more potent than CBD, similar to what we report here using the DPPH assay (Table 2), and that both are significantly better than another minor cannabinoid cannabinol (CBN) [10]. Additional studies examining the photoprotection potential of cannabinoids in human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaTs) and HDFs exposed to UVB and UVA, respectively, showed CBD to be the most effective protectant against UVA (although not significantly better than CBG), while CBN was the best at protecting against UVB and was significantly better than CBD and CBG [38]. The cell-based antioxidant results reported here (Table 2) support the growing literature that CBG and CBD are both potent antioxidants with a similar in vitro activity range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, utilizing the ABTS (2,2 -Azino-bis (3-Ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulfonic Acid)) cell-free antioxidant assay, Dawidowicz et al showed that CBG is slightly more potent than CBD, similar to what we report here using the DPPH assay (Table 2), and that both are significantly better than another minor cannabinoid cannabinol (CBN) [10]. Additional studies examining the photoprotection potential of cannabinoids in human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaTs) and HDFs exposed to UVB and UVA, respectively, showed CBD to be the most effective protectant against UVA (although not significantly better than CBG), while CBN was the best at protecting against UVB and was significantly better than CBD and CBG [38]. The cell-based antioxidant results reported here (Table 2) support the growing literature that CBG and CBD are both potent antioxidants with a similar in vitro activity range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is known that the percutaneous application of the preparation ensures a constant level of the compound used in the body and a high degree of sensitivity to the compound used [ 30 ]. Since CBD is a lipophilic molecule [ 74 ] it has previously been shown that it tends to accumulate only in the stratum corneum and penetrates poorly into deeper layers [ 75 ]. Therefore, the ability of CBD to enter the bloodstream was verified by assessing its level in the circulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CB2R receptor activation was also shown to activate Nrf-2 and induce heme oxygenase-1, a key cellular antioxidant in a mouse myocardial infarction model [ 96 ]. While Δ 9 -THC is typically oxidated one order of magnitude faster than other non-psychotropic cannabinoids, both CBD and CBG were shown to maintain redox stability and offer good UVA and UVB photoprotective properties [ 97 ].…”
Section: Ecs and The Oxidative Stress: Role Of Dietary Antioxidantsmentioning
confidence: 99%