2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimüllerian hormone as predictor of reproductive outcome in subfertile women with elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels: a follow-up study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AMH should be considered a more reliable ovarian reserve assessment test compared to FSH because there was a strong positive correlation between the serum AMH level and AFC; further, the use of AMH combined with AFC may improve ovarian reserve evaluation [20]. The present findings suggest the applicability of AMH determination as a marker for actual fertility in subfertile women with elevated basal FSH levels, as AMH was significantly associated with the timing of reproductive stages (i.e., the occurrence of menopausal transition or menopause during follow-up) [21]. Our results showed that the cut-off value of age was 36.50 for predicting ovarian reserve decline and that the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 88.0% and 40.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMH should be considered a more reliable ovarian reserve assessment test compared to FSH because there was a strong positive correlation between the serum AMH level and AFC; further, the use of AMH combined with AFC may improve ovarian reserve evaluation [20]. The present findings suggest the applicability of AMH determination as a marker for actual fertility in subfertile women with elevated basal FSH levels, as AMH was significantly associated with the timing of reproductive stages (i.e., the occurrence of menopausal transition or menopause during follow-up) [21]. Our results showed that the cut-off value of age was 36.50 for predicting ovarian reserve decline and that the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 88.0% and 40.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Many studies [17][18][19][20][21] have discussed how AFC and AMH could be used to assess ovarian reserve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A couple of patient related parameters were shown to be associated with basal AMH levels, amongst which female age [22], ovarian response [23], basal FSH [24] and medical indication [25] were shown to correlate with very low or high AMH values.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, genes involved in processing oxidative stress [24] and oxidative phosphorylation [27] were affected, which may ultimately result in an overall decline of mitochondrial capacity in cumulus cells of older patients. Furthermore, tropomyosin-related kinase, thought to mediate survival signals in order to maintain a viable COC, is underexpressed in patients with low AMH showing diminished ovarian reserve [28], thus promoting apoptosis in these patients.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos recentes sugerem que essa glicoproteína dimérica é superior e mais confiável, em comparação com o FSH, na avaliação da reserva ovariana. 9 O AMH nas mulheres é produzido pelas células da granulosa a partir dos folículos pré-antrais e antrais, na 36 a semanas de gestação. O AMH é expresso até os folículos atingirem um tamanho médio de 4-6 mm, estado de diferenciação no qual se tornam receptivos ao FSH exógeno.…”
Section: Avaliação Da Reserva Ovarianaunclassified