2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00941-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms

Abstract: Background The global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health problem impacted by antimicrobial use (AMU) for human and livestock applications. Extensive Iberian swine production is based on a more sustainable and eco-friendly management system, providing an excellent opportunity to evaluate how sustained differences in AMU impact the resistome, not only in the animals but also on the farm environment. Here, we evaluate the resistome footprint of an extensive pig farming system, maintained for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(75 reference statements)
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,Moor,submitted It is perhaps also relevant that we did not find any influence of antimicrobial treatments on the gut microbiota of pigs, which is a topic of controversy in the literature. 32,33 It has to be taken into consideration that our study was not well powered and different antimicrobials were administered which prevents drawing a final conclusion concerning the influence of antimicrobial substances on the gut microbiota of pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,Moor,submitted It is perhaps also relevant that we did not find any influence of antimicrobial treatments on the gut microbiota of pigs, which is a topic of controversy in the literature. 32,33 It has to be taken into consideration that our study was not well powered and different antimicrobials were administered which prevents drawing a final conclusion concerning the influence of antimicrobial substances on the gut microbiota of pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 127 ] Feces ( n = 38) Yes NS –Predominant by tetracycline, followed by aminoglycosides, MLS, and oxazolidinones. [ 128 ] Ileum ( n = 23) and colon content ( n = 24) Yes Chlortetracycline and virginiamycin –No significant difference in the structure and diversity of ARGs and MGE after administration of low-dose antimicrobials. –Predominant by tetracycline, followed by macrolide, aminoglycoside, lincosamide, and streptogramin in colon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent international studies have characterised the pig faecal resistome (Xiao et al., 2016; Munk et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019) or the EU farm environment (Luiken et al., 2020; Mencía‐Ares et al., 2020). ARGs in both dust and the farm environment are more diverse compared to the pig faecal resistome.…”
Section: Appendix F – Antimicrobial‐resistant Bacteria and Resistance Genes Of High Public Health Relevance In Environmental Sources Of Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific approaches need to move beyond surveys that simply identify ARB in the environment towards systematic and harmonised hypothesis‐driven investigations that definitively identify sources of AMR and selective agents for food‐producing environments, providing data that can be used to assess the risk to the food chain and public health. Such work should also identify interventions that can interrupt environmentally mediated pathways of AMR selection, acquisition and transmission and evaluate whether current and enhanced management practices and technologies to minimise environmental AMR contamination, especially for management of waste faecal material and water, can lead to desirable outcomes (Checcucci et al., 2020; Goulas et al., 2020; Mencía‐Ares et al., 2020; Ricker et al., 2020; Costa et al., 2021; Pereira et al., 2021; Radu et al., 2021; Youssef et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation