2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial susceptibility of non-fermenting Gram-negative pathogens isolated from cystic fibrosis patients

Abstract: Non-fermenting Gram negative bacteria are increasingly being cultured in respiratory samples from people with cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aimed to determine the susceptibility of clinical CF respiratory isolates from distinct geographical regions to a range of antimicrobials. A total of 286 isolates (106 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 100 Burkholderia spp., 59 Achromobacter spp., 12 Pandoraea spp. and 9 Ralstonia spp.) from The Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Spain, USA and Australia were tested. The MIC, M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 5 isolates showed colistin MIC <2 µg/mL (MIC range 0.125–1 µg/mL) and were therefore categorized as “colistin-susceptible” (Table 1). Overall, colistin susceptibility patterns of strains included in this study were consistent with those recently reported in other studies on S. maltophilia antibiotic susceptibility [8,23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining 5 isolates showed colistin MIC <2 µg/mL (MIC range 0.125–1 µg/mL) and were therefore categorized as “colistin-susceptible” (Table 1). Overall, colistin susceptibility patterns of strains included in this study were consistent with those recently reported in other studies on S. maltophilia antibiotic susceptibility [8,23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the precise clinical relevance of S. maltophilia in CF remains undetermined [3,4], chronic pulmonary colonization by S. maltophilia has been recently associated with an increased risk of pulmonary exacerbations requiring intravenous antibiotics, lung transplantation, and death [5,6,7]. Due to intrinsic and acquired multidrug resistance mechanisms and the propensity to grow as biofilm, S. maltophilia infections are difficult-to-treat and the therapeutic options are very limited [1,5,8,9,10,11]. Clinical breakpoints for the interpretation of susceptibility testing are available only for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) (i.e., the first-line treatment option) and few other compounds, namely levofloxacin, some beta-lactams (i.e., ticarcillin-clavulanate and ceftazidime), minocycline, and chloramphenicol [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering available clinical breakpoints, our results confirmed SXT is the most active compound against all the strains tested. The overall resistance to SXT was 18.7%, although its activity was significantly higher in non-CF than CF strains (96.3% versus 75%, respectively), in agreement with previous findings [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, a systematic review reported that fluoroquinolones show comparable effects on the mortality of S. maltophilia infection compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections [39], although high rates of resistance are also increasingly being reported. In the current study, the newer fluoroquinolone levofloxacin showed better activity against S. maltophilia than ciprofloxacin (susceptibility rates: 77.9% versus 18.8%, respectively), confirming previous studies [9,37,38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Isolates of the Pandoraea sp genus were shown to present variable susceptibility profiles to beta-lactams, being frequently resistant to meropenem and susceptible to imipenem. Among other classes, tetracycline and TMP-SMX were shown to have efficacy on a series of clinical isolates, including multi-drug resistant strains (4, 15,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%