2017
DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000000556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Japan from 2000 to 2015

Abstract: Background Gonococcal infections are difficult to treat because of their multidrug antimicrobial resistance. The outbreak of antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has begun in Asia and particularly in Japan. Therefore, it is very important that we understand the trend of antimicrobial resistance of N. gonorrhoeae in Asia including Japan. Our surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae began in 2000 under the guidance of the Department of Urology, Gifu University. We r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Reduced susceptibility of gonococci to azithromycin was reported in the 1990s, and although azithromycin has not been recommended as a monotherapy, growing reports of decreased azithromycin susceptibility are being monitored worldwide. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Azithromycin was recommended to be used in dual therapy with ceftriaxone in 2015, 6 to function as a shield to potentially delay the emergence of resistance to ceftriaxone, the last remaining antimicrobial option. This recommendation was modelled after combination antimicrobial therapy for prevention of resistance used for other infectious diseases such as tuberculosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Reduced susceptibility of gonococci to azithromycin was reported in the 1990s, and although azithromycin has not been recommended as a monotherapy, growing reports of decreased azithromycin susceptibility are being monitored worldwide. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Azithromycin was recommended to be used in dual therapy with ceftriaxone in 2015, 6 to function as a shield to potentially delay the emergence of resistance to ceftriaxone, the last remaining antimicrobial option. This recommendation was modelled after combination antimicrobial therapy for prevention of resistance used for other infectious diseases such as tuberculosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The predominant reason for this increase is the growth (from 2013 to 2017) in the proportion of isolates with low-level decreased susceptibility to azithromycin (MIC 2-4 µg/mL). 1 WHO 9 and other international organisations [10][11][12] reported an increase in the percentage of isolates with reduced susceptibility to azithromycin across multiple countries, approaching the level at which WHO recommends the review, modification, or discontinuation of an antimicrobial in empirical treatment. 9 Several cases of decreased susceptibility to both azithromycin and ceftriaxone have been recorded internationally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 27 individual countries with included surveillance systems, five were in the WHO African Region (n = 54 countries) [24][25][26][27][28][29], four in WHO Region of the Americas (n = 41 countries) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]; one in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (n = 22 countries) [40], nine in the WHO European Region (n = 53 countries) [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], three in the WHO South-East Asia Region (n = 11 countries) [55][56][57], and five in the WHO Western Pacific Region (n = 27 countries) [58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. See Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2a and Table S2b, which provide an overview of surveillance systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were extracted from: the COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net and CDDEP repositories, which include several surveillance systems and sources; four international surveillance systems, namely GLASS, EARS-Net, FWD-Net and Euro-GASP; seven national surveillance systems, namely AGAR-AURA (Australia), ANRESIS (Switzerland), CARA (Canada), CARSS (Canada), ICMR (India), Ministry of Health New Zealand (New Zealand) and SWEDRES (Sweden); and eight surveillance studies. 7–14 Out of 436 papers screened, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, data for a total of 2.018.241 isolates from 86 countries were extracted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%