1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1990.tb01039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter strains identified by DNA‐DNA hybridization

Abstract: The in vitro activity of 21 antimicrobial agents aginst 143 Acinetobacter strains (belonging to 12 different DNA hybridization groups) was studied. Of the antibiotics tested, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, doxycycline and imipenem had the lowest MICs. For most antibiotics there was a considerable overlap of the MICs between the DNA groups; however, some differences in antimicrobial susceptibility between DNA groups were found. Strains of DNA groups 2 (A. baumannii) and 13 (unnamed) were most resistant, and strains … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…baumannii strains were generally more resistant than strains identified as species other than A. baumannii. This is consistent with three recently published reports (8,19,20). Within A. baumannii strains, isolates belonging to biotype 9 were more resistant than other biotypes, confirming previous data (10).…”
Section: Materuils and Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…baumannii strains were generally more resistant than strains identified as species other than A. baumannii. This is consistent with three recently published reports (8,19,20). Within A. baumannii strains, isolates belonging to biotype 9 were more resistant than other biotypes, confirming previous data (10).…”
Section: Materuils and Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Among species other than A. baumannii, strains of Acinetobacter species strains 3 and 10 and A. johnsonii showed the highest resistance. The most susceptible strains were found in the species A. junii and A. Iwoffii; similar data were published recently (19).…”
Section: Materuils and Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The proper identification of Acinetobacter spp. at the species level is important for the application of the appropriate therapy to infections, because differences in antimicrobial efficacy against strains belonging to different species have been demonstrated (26,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All strains were identified as belonging to the genus Acinetobacter on the basis of following characteristics: oxidase negative, Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, non-motile, cocco bacilli. Identification was done according to the newest terminology by a numerical approach (10, 25) using a simplified identification scheme based on the data in (31). A strain was considered identified if the identification score (normalized likelihooda parameter stating the probability of identification of a strain to one of the species or DNA groups in the identification scheme) was 20.95 and the modal likelihood fraction (a parameter stating the degree of deviation of a strain from the typical reaction pattern of a strain in that species or DNA group) was 20.0001.…”
Section: Phenotypical Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was undertaken to eludicate the occurrence of Acinetobacter in the whole of Denmark, including an attempt to identify the isolates according to the newest terminology using a simplified phenotypical identification scheme containing 14 biochemical and susceptibility reactions adopted from Gerner-Smidt et al (16) and Tjernberg (31), and to evaluate the clinical relevance of the newly described different Acinetobacter species. In addition, the antibiotic susceptibility toward 10 antibiotics, including the 5 P-lactam antibiotics proposed by Joly-Guillou et al , was recorded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%