2003
DOI: 10.1128/aac.47.8.2699-2702.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Macrolide Resistance Inducibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae Carrying erm (A), erm (B), or mef (A)

Abstract: Erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from young carriers were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibility; additionally, inducibility of macrolide and clindamycin resistance was investigated in pneumococci carrying erm(A), erm(B), or mef(A). Of 125 strains tested, 101 (81%) were multidrug resistant. Different levels of induction were observed with erythromycin, miocamycin, and clindamycin in erm(B) strains; however, in erm(A) strains only erythromycin was an inducer. Induction did not aff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings demonstrated that the bicyclolide nucleus and aromatic side chain of modithromycin would contribute to the increased affinity for the dimethylated ribosome of streptococci, including telithromycin-resistant strains. Unlike the Erm phenotype in streptococci, except for ErmTR, the expression of the Erm phenotype can be determined to be inducible or constitutive in S. aureus by the inducibility test using erythromycin and clindamycin (17,27). Against the ermA-, ermB-, or ermC-carrying MSSA strains, clarithromycin and azithromycin were inactive regardless of the inducible or constitutive resistance phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings demonstrated that the bicyclolide nucleus and aromatic side chain of modithromycin would contribute to the increased affinity for the dimethylated ribosome of streptococci, including telithromycin-resistant strains. Unlike the Erm phenotype in streptococci, except for ErmTR, the expression of the Erm phenotype can be determined to be inducible or constitutive in S. aureus by the inducibility test using erythromycin and clindamycin (17,27). Against the ermA-, ermB-, or ermC-carrying MSSA strains, clarithromycin and azithromycin were inactive regardless of the inducible or constitutive resistance phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target site modifications and active efflux pumps are known to be the predominant macrolide resistance mechanisms in streptococci and staphylococci (17,27,28). As for the target site modification, some methylase enzymes encoded by the erm genes induce dimethylation of an adenine residue in domain V, the peptidyltransferase site, of a 23S ribosomal subunit, which results in reduced binding affinity to macrolide, lincosamide (clindamycin), and streptogramin B (MLS B ) antibiotics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding macrolide resistance determinants, little is known about them in mutans group streptococci other than S. mutans strain V1, which was isolated from the heart valve of an infected endocarditis patient and showed resistance to erythromycin by carrying a gene homologous to erm(B) of S. pneumoniae (Nemoto et al, 2008). The erm(B) gene was shown to confer resistance to lincosamides and 14-, 15-and 16-membered-ring macrolides (Syrogiannopoulos et al, 2003); it was carried by either Tn917 or omega elements and each element was integrated into the Tn916 transposon, which carries the tetracycline resistance gene tet(M) in S. pneumoniae (Croucher et al, 2011). Of note is that the Tn916-related transposons Tn6002, Tn6003 and Tn3872 containing an unexpressed 'silent' tet(M) were found in erm(B)-positive tetracycline-susceptible isolates of S. pneumoniae, S. mitis and S. oralis (Cochetti et al, 2007;Brenciani et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telithromycin retains excellent antimicrobial activity against Mef(E)/Mel-containing pneumococci (12,49). However, more detailed reports showed that the efflux pump conferred small increases in pneumococcal MICs of telithromycin after preincubation with subinhibitory concentrations of telithromycin (12,49) or in comparison to the MICs of clinical isolates with and without mef(E)-mel (46). To determine whether the lack of telithromycin resistance was due to an inefficient induction of mef(E)-mel expression or poor efflux of telithromycin by Mef(E)/Mel, the inducing ability of telithromycin was tested in the disk diffusion assay.…”
Section: Environmental or Antibiotic (Nonmacrolide) Stress And Competmentioning
confidence: 99%