receive royalties from the POCT certificate training program referenced in this manuscript.
Disclaimers:The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers. Alex Adams previously served as vice president of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS) and NACDS Foundation, and his participation in this paper stems from these previous roles.Progressive pharmacy laws do not always lead to progressive pharmacy practice.Progressive laws are necessary, but not sufficient for pharmacy services to take off in practice.Colleges of pharmacy can play critical roles by working collaboratively with community pharmacies to close the gap between law and practice. Our experiences launching pharmacybased point-of-care testing services in community pharmacy settings illustrates some of the roles colleges can play, including: developing and providing standardized training; developing It is often noted that pharmacists are educated and trained to perform services that are not yet allowed under their static state laws. Groups will routinely attempt to remedy this gap by advancing "scope of practice" measures in front of their legislative bodies and regulatory boards, often against the objections of other health professions. As bills are signed into law and regulations take effect, the gap between practice and law is narrowed and pharmacists may provide the newly authorized patient care service. Pharmacists often treat this as the endpoint of a successful campaign; in our experience, this is just the starting point.We have routinely observed a gap between law and practice, in that, services that are allowed to be performed by pharmacists under state law are not actually provided in practice. A permissive law opens the door; whether or not pharmacists walk through that door is dependent on many market pressures. These pressures include, but are not limited to, patient acceptance and demand, alignment of service to pharmacy mission, facility policies, workflow considerations, payer policies, threat of liability, and pharmacist comfort in providing the service, among other factors.
1Colleges of pharmacy have a critical role to play in closing the gap between law and practice and helping pharmacists overcome these market pressures. Our experience in implementing point-of-care testing (POCT) services for infectious diseases in community pharmacies provides one illustrative example of the role colleges of pharmacy may play. We first launched POCT services as a small pilot in one store in Michigan. This did not follow the passage of any specific laws or regulations; instead Michigan is a state that generally allows services unless they are specifically prohibited. Over time we scaled this service to 86 pharmacies in 7states that similarly had a permissive legal environment to support the service. Specifially, pharmacists at participating pharmacies used an evidence-based protocol to treat patients with influenza-like illness or Group A Streptococ...