2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04438-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with immune thrombocytopenia treated with rituximab: a retrospective multicenter analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…46 Some clinicians use anti-infective prophylaxis for patients undergoing rituximab treatment, though evidence to support its use is lacking. 55 Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians also must take into consideration the B-cell depletion effect of rituximab, which may impair vaccine response for at least 6 months after administration. 56…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Some clinicians use anti-infective prophylaxis for patients undergoing rituximab treatment, though evidence to support its use is lacking. 55 Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians also must take into consideration the B-cell depletion effect of rituximab, which may impair vaccine response for at least 6 months after administration. 56…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, females were less likely to be dispensed TMP-SMX. Prior studies did not find that antibiotic prophylaxis differed according to patient sex in AAV [ 19 ] or in other systemic diseases treated with immunosuppressants [ 26 , 35 ] or RTX [ 27 , 36 ]. In a Japanese prospective inception cohort, the female sex was protective against serious infections in AAV (adjusted HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.25,0.89]) [ 6 ], and we observed a small but significant difference in serious infections (in the 6 months prior to RTX) between females (6%) and males (11%) in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyhow, we have to highlight that splenectomies were all performed >5 years since the SARS‐CoV2 infection and that none of the patients had previously been treated with rituximab. The impact of splenectomy on COVID‐19 is controversial, since this surgery procedure seems to increase more the risk of bacterial than viral infections; after rituximab, severe infections caused by hepatitis B virus, cytomegalovirus, Herpes zoster and Pneumocystis jirovecii have been reported and some clinicians prescribe prophylactic anti‐microbial therapy also in ITP cases [ 13 ]. Regarding patients on therapy, the low rate of infection in those treated with TPO‐RAs is consistent with data from literature showing relative safety of this class of drugs [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%