Time-kill curve experiments were performed with linezolid, doripenem, tigecycline, moxifloxacin, and daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and with colistin, moxifloxacin, and doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa to evaluate the effect of porcine pulmonary surfactant on antimicrobial activity. Pulmonary surfactant significantly impaired the activities of moxifloxacin and colistin. When antibiotics are being developed for respiratory tract infections, the method described here might be used to preliminarily quantify the effect of pulmonary surfactant on antimicrobial activity. G enerally, the susceptibilities of bacterial strains to antimicrobial agents are determined by comparing the MICs in standard nutrient solutions, i.e., Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB), with established breakpoints. This information is used to predict the clinical efficacy of an antimicrobial agent against a bacterial strain. However, one must consider that, apart from antimicrobial susceptibility, the characteristics of different infection sites may also affect the pharmacodynamic activity of antibiotics. This, for example, has already been described for the activity of fosfomycin in cerebrospinal fluid (1).Until today, only a few studies investigated the effect of pulmonary surfactant (PS) on the activity of antibiotics (2, 3). In these studies, the efficacy of some antibiotics was negatively affected by PS. Indeed, it was observed that daptomycin and tobramycin, both highly effective in vitro against pathogens responsible for respiratory tract infections (RTI), preclinically or clinically failed in the presence of PS (2, 3). Drug binding either to surfactantassociated proteins or to phospholipids was blamed for the reduced antimicrobial activity. In contrast, other antibiotics, such as telavancin, vancomycin, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin, remain unaffected by surfactant in vitro (3-5). This fact bears importance for the choice of antibiotics to successfully treat lower RTI.Although there may be appropriate methods to obtain human alveolar surfactant, it is difficult to obtain and probably impossible to obtain in large amounts for in vitro experiments due to ethical concerns. Therefore, we had to use a surrogate for our experiments. While recent in vitro studies used bovine surfactant to evaluate its effect on antimicrobial activity (2, 3), this is the first study using porcine surfactant. Porcine surfactant was used because clinical studies showed superiority of porcine surfactant over other types of mammalian surfactant for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (6, 7).In general, MHB (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was cation adjusted to a level of 25 mg/liter Ca 2ϩ and 12.5 mg/liter Mg 2ϩ and served as the reference medium. For experiments with daptomycin, MHB was supplemented with Ca 2ϩ to a final level of 50 mg/ liter as recommended by the CLSI (8).For settings testing the influence of PS, cation-adjusted MHB was enriched with porcine surfactant (Curosurf; Chiesi Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Vienna) to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml (M...