Abstract:Biological drugs intended for multi-dose application require the presence of antimicrobial preservatives to avoid microbial growth. As the presence of certain preservatives has been reported to increase protein and peptide particle formation, it is essential to choose a preservative compatible with the active pharmaceutical ingredient in addition to its preservation function. Thus, this review describes the current status of the use of antimicrobial preservatives in biologic formulations considering (i) approp… Show more
“…The use of combinations of benzyl alcohol with chlorobutanol and benzyl alcohol with methylparaben may enhance antifungal activity of the formulation compared to the single use of preservatives. The combination of methylparaben and propylparaben increases the antibacterial effect of the preservative system, but also affects the solubility, and enables the protection of both phases of the emulsions [31]. It is speculated that alcohols (benzyl alcohol and pentyl alcohol) exhibit synergistic effects with benzalkonium chloride [32].…”
The aim of this study was to indicate the type of preservatives used in selected categories of cosmetic products sold in Poland (part of the EU market) and determine the frequency of their use. The tested products consisted of 200 leave-on cosmetics, viz. body lotions (n = 100) and face creams (n = 100) and rinse-off cosmetics (n = 100) and mascaras (n = 25). The product labels of 325 adult cosmetic products from international brands were analyzed for the presence of preservatives based on the INCI compositions. The survey focused on preservatives included in Annex V of the Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. The tested products contained 29 different preservatives belonging to eight chemical groups. Most preservatives were alcohols or their derivatives, carboxylic acids or their salts, or parabens. The most common types were phenoxyethanol, present in 198/325 (60.9%) formulations, followed by sodium benzoate, in 137 (42.2%), potassium sorbate, in 116 (35.7%), benzyl alcohol, in 76 (23.4%), and methylparaben in 33 (10.2%). Also, 33 of the 60 preservatives included in Annex V of Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 were not used in any of the tested preparations. In each category of products, the most common were combinations of two preservatives per single product (34.8% of all products), followed by single-preservative products (25.5%) and three-preservative products (19.4%).
“…The use of combinations of benzyl alcohol with chlorobutanol and benzyl alcohol with methylparaben may enhance antifungal activity of the formulation compared to the single use of preservatives. The combination of methylparaben and propylparaben increases the antibacterial effect of the preservative system, but also affects the solubility, and enables the protection of both phases of the emulsions [31]. It is speculated that alcohols (benzyl alcohol and pentyl alcohol) exhibit synergistic effects with benzalkonium chloride [32].…”
The aim of this study was to indicate the type of preservatives used in selected categories of cosmetic products sold in Poland (part of the EU market) and determine the frequency of their use. The tested products consisted of 200 leave-on cosmetics, viz. body lotions (n = 100) and face creams (n = 100) and rinse-off cosmetics (n = 100) and mascaras (n = 25). The product labels of 325 adult cosmetic products from international brands were analyzed for the presence of preservatives based on the INCI compositions. The survey focused on preservatives included in Annex V of the Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. The tested products contained 29 different preservatives belonging to eight chemical groups. Most preservatives were alcohols or their derivatives, carboxylic acids or their salts, or parabens. The most common types were phenoxyethanol, present in 198/325 (60.9%) formulations, followed by sodium benzoate, in 137 (42.2%), potassium sorbate, in 116 (35.7%), benzyl alcohol, in 76 (23.4%), and methylparaben in 33 (10.2%). Also, 33 of the 60 preservatives included in Annex V of Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 were not used in any of the tested preparations. In each category of products, the most common were combinations of two preservatives per single product (34.8% of all products), followed by single-preservative products (25.5%) and three-preservative products (19.4%).
“…In comparison to our results with AH-adsorbed HPV16 VLPs, mechanistic studies on the structural destabilization effects of APs used in multi-dose formulations of protein therapeutic candidates have been reported on a variety of smaller, globular proteins (in solution), including recombinant human growth hormone [ 21 ], recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) [ 20 , 44 ], recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhGCSF) [ 45 ], interferon alpha-2a (IFNA2), and cytochrome c [ 46 , 47 , 48 ]. In these studies, with APs other than TH, the interactions between APs and proteins were hypothesized to occur primarily through non-covalent hydrophobic forces [ 18 , 20 , 44 , 49 ]. Many of these APs (e.g., 2-phenoxyethanol, benzyl alcohol, phenol, methyl/propylparaben, and m-cresol) are phenolic or phenyl derivatives and are thus mostly hydrophobic in nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both empirical and statistical (DOE) screening studies with hundreds of candidate multi-dose formulations were then performed. Seven different APs found in approved parenteral products were evaluated [ 6 , 14 , 18 ], both individually and in combination, including chlorobutanol (CB), m-cresol (MC), 2-phenoxyl ethanol (2-PE), benzyl alcohol (BA), phenol, (PH) methylparaben (MP), and propylparaben (PP) [ 15 ]. Stable candidate HPV VLP multi-dose formulations included certain APs (CB, 2-PE, BA, or 2-PE + BA), while other APs (MC, PH, and parabens) displayed suboptimal stability [ 16 ].…”
During the multi-dose formulation development of recombinant vaccine candidates, protein antigens can be destabilized by antimicrobial preservatives (APs). The degradation mechanisms are often poorly understood since available analytical tools are limited due to low protein concentrations and the presence of adjuvants. In this work, we evaluate different analytical approaches to monitor the structural integrity of HPV16 VLPs adsorbed to Alhydrogel™ (AH) in the presence and absence of APs (i.e., destabilizing m-cresol, MC, or non-destabilizing chlorobutanol, CB) under accelerated conditions (pH 7.4, 50 °C). First, in vitro potency losses displayed only modest correlations with the results from two commonly used methods of protein analysis (SDS-PAGE, DSC). Next, results from two alternative analytical approaches provided a better understanding of physicochemical events occurring under these same conditions: (1) competitive ELISA immunoassays with a panel of mAbs against conformational and linear epitopes on HPV16 VLPs and (2) LC-MS peptide mapping to evaluate the accessibility/redox state of the 12 cysteine residues within each L1 protein comprising the HPV16 VLP (i.e., with 360 L1 proteins per VLP, there are 4320 Cys residues per VLP). These methods expand the limited analytical toolset currently available to characterize AH-adsorbed antigens and provide additional insights into the molecular mechanism(s) of AP-induced destabilization of vaccine antigens.
“…If gels are prepared following a straightforward freeze-drying method, cryoaerogel structures can be formulated. Due to the freezing of the gel and the subsequent sublimation to remove the solvent, a highly porous solid structure is obtained [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, a mesoporous tablet-shaped potato starch aerogel was developed as carriers of celecoxib in order to enhance the drug solubility. The obtained data revealed that the prepared aerogels were able to improve the dissolution rate of the loaded celecoxib compared to the pure drug [ 14 ]. In another research study, using the Minitab experimental design software, the major factors for the aerogel synthesis along with optimal values of these parameters were specified.…”
In this study, a starch cryoaerogel formulation was developed as a carrier for poorly water-soluble drugs, like atorvastatin. Cryoaerogels were generated through a sol–gel method combined with a freeze-drying technique, and atorvastatin was incorporated into the obtained mesoporous systems during the solvent exchange stage. The formulated drug-loaded polymer structures were characterized in terms of their physicochemical properties, solid-state behavior, and cytotoxicity. They had a pore size of 27.56 nm and a drug loading size of 38.60%. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses indicated that atorvastatin was successfully incorporated into the cryoaerogel pores. The amorphous nature of the loaded drug was confirmed via X-ray diffraction (XRD). Furthermore, after the atorvastatin incorporation into the cryogel, the volume of nitrogen adsorbed on one gram of cryoaerogel (Vm), as well as the specific surface area (aBET) were reduced. The comparison between the drug release profiles of crystalline atorvastatin and the loaded formulation of atorvastatin showed that by including the drug into the pores of the developed cryoaerogel matrix its solubility was significantly improved—the time for the dissolution of 30% pure atorvastatin (t30%) was approximately 4 h, whereas the determined t30% for the formulated cryoaerogels was only 1 h. Moreover, the data from the MTT assay illustrated that the designed cryoaerogel could be used as a safe oral atorvastatin delivery system. According to obtained results, it could be concluded that the starch cryoaerogel formulation is a promising candidate for oral delivery of poorly water-soluble therapeutic agents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.