2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2005.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial peptide defenses of the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the reduced susceptibility of frogs from persistent populations could be an outcome of natural selection (36) on R. sierrae that occurred after the arrival of Bd in Yosemite's frog populations, selection to which the naïve frog populations would not have been subject. For example, if the initial invasion of Bd into Yosemite decades ago resulted in high levels of frog mortality, then the remaining populations may be descendants of individuals that possessed more effective innate or adaptive defenses against Bd (35,37). Second, the lower susceptibility could be the result of an acquired immune response in frogs from persistent populations after their exposure to Bd in the wild, a response that itself could be subject to natural selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the reduced susceptibility of frogs from persistent populations could be an outcome of natural selection (36) on R. sierrae that occurred after the arrival of Bd in Yosemite's frog populations, selection to which the naïve frog populations would not have been subject. For example, if the initial invasion of Bd into Yosemite decades ago resulted in high levels of frog mortality, then the remaining populations may be descendants of individuals that possessed more effective innate or adaptive defenses against Bd (35,37). Second, the lower susceptibility could be the result of an acquired immune response in frogs from persistent populations after their exposure to Bd in the wild, a response that itself could be subject to natural selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this scenario, Bd growth rates do in fact decline with temperature as predicted but do not translate into the expected reduced infection intensities on frogs because both the innate and acquired immune systems of amphibians are less effective at these low temperatures (Carey et al 1999). For example, amphibians, including mountain yellow-legged frogs, produce a wide variety of antimicrobial skin peptides that strongly suppress the growth of Bd (Rollins-Smith et al 2002, Rollins-Smith et al 2006) but production of these peptides is greatly reduced at low temperatures (Matutte et al 2000, Ribas et al 2009. Similarly, proliferation of T lymphocytes is much lower at cold temperatures than at higher temperatures (Maniero and Carey 1997).…”
Section: Predictive Failure Of the Temperature-bd Growth Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, measurements of skin peptides reflect the most recent peptide release, which is influenced by sensitivity to noradrenaline as well as by the amount of peptides that are stored in the glands. Hydrophobic peptides were collected onto C-18 Sep-Pak cartridges (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) (Ramsey et al, 2010) and then eluted in elution buffer containing 70% acetonitrile, 29.9% water and 0.1% TFA (Rollins-Smith et al, 2006). Concentrations of peptides were determined using Micro BCA analysis (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions, with the exception that bradykinin was used to establish a standard curve (Rollins-Smith et al, 2006).…”
Section: Skin Peptide Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%