2009
DOI: 10.1592/phco.29.5.562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Dosing Concepts and Recommendations for Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy or Intermittent Hemodialysis

Abstract: Infectious diseases and impaired renal function often occur in critically ill patients, and delaying the start of appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy or starting inappropriate therapy has been associated with poor outcomes. Our primary objective was to critically review and discuss the influence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) on the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of antimicrobial agents. The effect of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
120
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, using the recommended 30-ml/kg/h effluent rate for both modes (a 30-ml/kg/h ultrafiltrate flow rate for CVVH and a 15-ml/kg/h dialysate flow rate associated with a 15-ml/kg/h ultrafiltrate flow rate for CVVHDF) (29), similar blood flow rates, and similar membranes during the RRT sessions, we did not show any significant differences in amikacin clearance. It could be hypothesized that when the recommended high doses of the effluent rate for continuous RRT are applied, the difference between convection and/or diffusion might not be significant for antibiotic pharmacokinetics (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, using the recommended 30-ml/kg/h effluent rate for both modes (a 30-ml/kg/h ultrafiltrate flow rate for CVVH and a 15-ml/kg/h dialysate flow rate associated with a 15-ml/kg/h ultrafiltrate flow rate for CVVHDF) (29), similar blood flow rates, and similar membranes during the RRT sessions, we did not show any significant differences in amikacin clearance. It could be hypothesized that when the recommended high doses of the effluent rate for continuous RRT are applied, the difference between convection and/or diffusion might not be significant for antibiotic pharmacokinetics (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the fast clearance of small-molecular-weight compounds during dialysis, additional dosing considerations come into play when hemodialysis support is necessary (11,18). Tedizolid exhibits high protein binding (ϳ80%) compared with the low (ϳ30%) protein binding of linezolid (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many antibacterials necessitate adjustments to dose size, dose frequency, or both when patients with impaired renal or hepatic function are treated (10,11) because chronic kidney disease and serious liver disease cause complex changes to the metabolism and elimination of many antibacterials (10,11). These disorders are also associated with increased risk of serious infections, including those due to drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens (10,12,13), and clinically significant adverse effects caused by antibacterial treatment itself (10,14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 25-50 ml/min/1.73 m 2 should be given 10 mg/ kg q12h; those with CrCl 10-25 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , 10 mg/kg q24h; and those with CrCl < 10 ml/min/1.73 m 2 5 mg/kg q24h. Patients on thrice-weekly hemodialysis should be given 2.5-5.0 mg/kg q24h (given after dialysis on those days), while those on peritoneal dialysis should be treated with 10 mg/kg q24h [107]. Approximately 15 % (9-22 % in 1 study [108]) of drug is bound to serum proteins and therefore much of the drug can be removed by dialysis.…”
Section: Antiviral Medicationmentioning
confidence: 99%