2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00556.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Chitosan‐Lysozyme (CL) Films and Coatings for Enhancing Microbial Safety of Mozzarella Cheese

Abstract: This study investigated the antimicrobial activities of chitosan-lysozyme (CL) composite films and coatings against tested microorganisms inoculated onto the surface of Mozzarella cheese. CL film-forming solutions (FFS) with a pH of 4.4 to 4.5 were prepared by incorporating 0% or 60% lysozyme (per dry weight of chitosan) into chitosan FFS with or without a pH adjustment to 5.2. Sliced cheese was subjected to 3 CL package applications: film, lamination on a multilayer coextruded film, and coating. Cheese was in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(46 reference statements)
6
91
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to their protective outer membrane surrounding the peptidoglycan layer, it does not show antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, the application of lysozyme in active packaging targets mainly inhibition of the critical Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes (Duan, Park, Daeschel, & Zhao, 2007;Min, Harris, Han, & Krochta, 2005). However, when lysozyme is combined with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria are destabilized by EDTA and the obtained films become effective on the other critical pathogenic bacteria including Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium (Gucbilmez, Yemenicioglu, & Arslanoglu, 2007;Mecitoglu et al, 2006;Padgett, Han, & Dawson, 1998;Ünalan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to their protective outer membrane surrounding the peptidoglycan layer, it does not show antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, the application of lysozyme in active packaging targets mainly inhibition of the critical Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes (Duan, Park, Daeschel, & Zhao, 2007;Min, Harris, Han, & Krochta, 2005). However, when lysozyme is combined with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria are destabilized by EDTA and the obtained films become effective on the other critical pathogenic bacteria including Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium (Gucbilmez, Yemenicioglu, & Arslanoglu, 2007;Mecitoglu et al, 2006;Padgett, Han, & Dawson, 1998;Ünalan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the application of LYS in active packaging targets mainly the inhibition of critical Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes (Duan, Park, Daeschel, & Zhao, 2007). The prevention of food contamination by L. monocytogenes, and application of hurdles to prevent listerial growth in risky food are critically important since this bacterium may cause deadly infections ( Alvarez-Ord oñez, Leong, Hickey, Beaufort, & Jordan, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of cheese with Chitosan lead to the inhibition and retardation of molds and yeasts growth and lowered the maximum growth levels in the cheese, as mentioned by (Sagoo, et al, 2002), they reported a similar sensitivity to Chitosan for yeasts and molds; they concluded that the yeasts and molds counts in sausage dipped in 1.0% Chitosan were reduced approximately by 2 log CFU /g at the end of 18 storage days at 4 o C. Also, Duan et al, (2007) mentioned yeast and mold increased to 10 5 CFU/g in untreated Mozzarella cheese after 30 d storage. Bostan and Mahan, (2011) revealed that yeast and mold counts in sausage treated with Chitosan during cold storage were considerably lower than non-treated sausage at all sampling days.…”
Section: Rersults and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%