2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial activity of sulfur nanoparticles: Effect of preparation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SNP was nanosized (~50–100 nm) and roughly spherical, whereas ES was mostly non‐uniform and in the micron range. Previously, the shape and size have been reported to be spherical and ~20 nm, respectively 12 . The EDX analysis results showed the presence of sulfur was in both SNP and ES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…SNP was nanosized (~50–100 nm) and roughly spherical, whereas ES was mostly non‐uniform and in the micron range. Previously, the shape and size have been reported to be spherical and ~20 nm, respectively 12 . The EDX analysis results showed the presence of sulfur was in both SNP and ES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…SNPs were prepared by following the method of Saedi et al (2020) using ES and sodium sulfide 12 . For this, 20 ml of 1‐M sodium sulfide was heated up to 100°C, added 1.6 g of ES and stirred vigorously for 1 h. The yellow colour of ES turned red, indicating the formation of polysulfide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations