2004
DOI: 10.1128/aac.48.2.673-676.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Activity and Bacterial-Membrane Interaction of Ovine-Derived Cathelicidins

Abstract: Three ovine-derived cathelicidins, SMAP29, OaBac5mini, and OaBac7.5mini, were compared with respect to their antibacterial activities and interactions with membranes. SMAP29 was confirmed to be ␣-helical, broad spectrum, and able to disrupt both the outer and the cytoplasmic membranes at relatively low concentrations. In contrast, the two proline-and arginine-rich OaBac peptides had more-modest antibacterial activities, reduced levels of lipopolysaccharide binding, and a lesser ability to depolarize the cytopl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

13
66
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained by the broth microdilution assay allowed to compare the activity of ChBac5 with previously described bovine Bac5 and Bac7 (Gennaro et al 1989) and ovine Bac5 which were tested in similar conditions. The activity of ChBac3.4 against gramnegative bacteria closely matched to that of ChBac5 and that described for bovine Bac5, Bac7 and their N-terminal fragments (Gennaro et al 1989;Podda et al 2006;Benincasa et al 2004); and to the activity of Bac5, OaBac5mini and OaBac7.5mini of sheep (Anderson and Yu 2003;Anderson et al 2004). Conversely, ChBac3.4 was significantly more active against gram-positive bacteria than ChBac5 as well as than bovine Bac5, Bac7 and somewhat more active than a 24-residues N-terminal fragment of ovine Bac5 (OaBac5mini) and OaBac7.5mini, which also demonstrated some effects in respect with Staphylococci (Anderson et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The results obtained by the broth microdilution assay allowed to compare the activity of ChBac5 with previously described bovine Bac5 and Bac7 (Gennaro et al 1989) and ovine Bac5 which were tested in similar conditions. The activity of ChBac3.4 against gramnegative bacteria closely matched to that of ChBac5 and that described for bovine Bac5, Bac7 and their N-terminal fragments (Gennaro et al 1989;Podda et al 2006;Benincasa et al 2004); and to the activity of Bac5, OaBac5mini and OaBac7.5mini of sheep (Anderson and Yu 2003;Anderson et al 2004). Conversely, ChBac3.4 was significantly more active against gram-positive bacteria than ChBac5 as well as than bovine Bac5, Bac7 and somewhat more active than a 24-residues N-terminal fragment of ovine Bac5 (OaBac5mini) and OaBac7.5mini, which also demonstrated some effects in respect with Staphylococci (Anderson et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It is known that AMPs, including SMAP29 and LL-37, can permeabilize the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane (26,27), as did P3, which created many membrane pores in the E. coli membrane, in line with the barrel stave model (28). It is generally considered that AMPs exhibiting potent antimicrobial activities also have strong hemolytic and cytotoxic activities (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions of CAPs with their microbial targets are thought to occur electrostatically, mediated by lipid molecules on bacterial surfaces (3,23,34,35). Numerous studies of CAP interactions with variably charged liposomes suggest that antimicrobial peptides selectively bind bacterial over eukaryotic cell membranes because of the negatively charged lipids found on the outer leaflets of the former (10,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ubiquitous peptides typically consist of 20 to 40 amino acid residues and are highly cationic. Most host-derived CAPs display broad activity against both gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria (3,4,6,8,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation