Antimalarial efficacy of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, amodiaquine and a combination of chloroquine plus sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine in Bundi Bugyo, western Uganda

Checchi, Francesco; Piola, Patrice; Kosack, Cara; Ardizzoni, Elisa; Klarkowski, Derryck; Kwezi, Eric; Priotto, Gérardo; Balkan, Suna; Bakyaita, Nathan; Brockman, Alan; Guthmann, Jean-Paul

doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01217.x

Cited by 33 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[3][4][5][6][7] The MoH-recommended first-line antimalarial drug in Uganda is chloroquine combined with sulfadoxinepyrimethamine, 6 though introduction of artemisininbased combination treatments (ACTs) is planned for 2005. 8 Day-28 cure rates of 52%, 9 65%, 7 and 77% 10 have been reported for this combination in different parts of Uganda. ACTs are judged effective in Africa, where they improve cure rates and reduce gametocyte carriage compared with presently used monotherapies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial

Piola¹,

Fogg²,

et al. 2005

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CitationSupervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial., 365 (9469 Articles IntroductionWith an estimated 500 million individuals affected every year, malaria is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa along with HIV/AIDS. 1Of the 1 million deaths caused by malaria worldwide, about 90% occur in African children, a situation compounded by the emergence of drug resistance. 2In Uganda, which had a population of 24·7 million in 2003, an estimated 9·8 million individuals are infected with malaria every year (John Bosco Rwakimari, Ugandan Ministry of Health, Uganda, personal communication; http://www.health.go.ug). To tackle malaria-related mortality and morbidity, the Ugandan Ministry of Health (MoH) is concentrating on early diagnosis and effective treatment of the disease. In the 1970s and the 1980s, high malaria awareness in the population and easy access to cheap and effective antimalarials such as chloroquine and sulfadoxinepyrimethamine ensured the disease was reasonably well controlled. However, resistance to these drugs is now widespread in Uganda and in other parts of east Africa, with adverse consequences for malaria control. 3-7The MoH-recommended first-line antimalarial drug in Uganda is chloroquine combined with sulfadoxinepyrimethamine, 6 though introduction of artemisininbased combination treatments (ACTs) is planned for 2005.8 Day-28 cure rates of 52%, 9 65%, 7 and 77% 10 have been reported for this combination in different parts of Uganda. ACTs are judged effective in Africa, where they improve cure rates and reduce gametocyte carriage compared with presently used monotherapies.11,12 To combat drug-resistant malaria in Africa, WHO advocates the adoption of ACTs as first-line treatment.2 The use of the non-ACT combination of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is considered by some as an interim measure while waiting for ACTs to become widely available. Day-28 efficacy rates of this combination were 84% and 90% in two studies in Uganda. 7,9 Artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) is the only fixed-dose formulation ACT on the WHO essential drug list. However, the combination is not registered for use in pregnant women, and was not registered for children under 10 kg in weight when we did our trial. Results of studies [13][14][15] from southeast Asia show that the six-dose regimen of artemether-lumefantrine has cure rates of more than 96%, is well tolerated, and has a good safety profile when Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial Patrice Piola, Carole Fogg, Francis Bajunirwe, Samuel Biraro, Francesco Grandesso, Eugene Ruzagira, Joseph Babigumira, Isaac Kigozi, James Kiguli, Juliet Kyomuhendo, Laurent Ferradini, Walter Taylor, Francesco Checchi, Jean-Paul Guthmann S...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial

Piola¹,

Fogg²,

et al. 2005

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While in the CQ and AQ groups the failures were more evenly distributed throughout the 28-day follow-up, all four treatment failures to SP in Koumra and almost all those in Bongor (11 failures out of 15) occurred during the first 3 days after the first drug intake. Resistance to SP develops rapidly (Bloland, 2001), and similar studies recently reported in the near Sudan (Stivanello et al, 2004) and Uganda (Checchi et al, 2004) already showed unacceptably high levels of resistance. Considering its relatively low efficacy in Bongor and the rapid development of resistance, SP does not seem an appropriate alternative to CQ as firstline treatment in Chad.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 72%

Efficacy of chloroquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and amodiaquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children under five in Bongor and Koumra, Chad

Grandesso¹,

Bachy²,

Donam

et al. 2006

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CitationEfficacy of chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children under five in Bongor and Koumra, Chad. 2006 a v a i l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r h e a l t h . c o m / j o u r n a l s / t r s t SummaryWe report two 28-day in-vivo antimalarial efficacy studies carried out in the urban centres of Bongor and Koumra, southern Chad. We assess chloroquine (CQ), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ) to treat Plasmodium falciparum uncomplicated malaria. Methods and outcome classification complied with latest WHO guidelines. Out of the 301 and 318 children aged 6−59 months included in Bongor and Koumra, respectively, 246 (81.7%) and 257 (80.8%) were eligible for analysis. In Bongor and Koumra, the 28-day PCR-adjusted failure rates for CQ were 23.7% (95% CI 14.7-34.8%) and 32.9% (95% CI 22.1-45.1%), respectively, and those for SP were 16.3% (95% CI 9.4-25.5%) and 4.3% (95% CI 1.2-10.5%). AQ failure rates were 6.4% (95% CI 2.1-14.3%) and 2.2% (95% CI 0.3-7.6%). The current use of CQ in Bongor and Koumra is questionable, and a more efficacious treatment is needed. Considering the reduced efficacy of SP in Bongor, AQ seems to be the best option for the time being. Following WHO recommendations that prioritize the use of artemisinin-based combinations, artesunate plus amodiaquine could be a potential

show abstract

“…These probabilities were estimated using the risk of parasitemia, unadjusted by genotyping, as measured in antimalarial drug efficacy studies conducted in Uganda [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Economic Evaluation of Home Management of Malaria in Uganda: An Interactive Markov Model

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundHome management of malaria (HMM), promoting presumptive treatment of febrile children in the community, is advocated to improve prompt appropriate treatment of malaria in Africa. The cost-effectiveness of HMM is likely to vary widely in different settings and with the antimalarial drugs used. However, no data on the cost-effectiveness of HMM programmes are available.Methods/Principal FindingsA Markov model was constructed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of HMM as compared to conventional care for febrile illnesses in children without HMM. The model was populated with data from Uganda, but is designed to be interactive, allowing the user to adjust certain parameters, including the antimalarials distributed. The model calculates the cost per disability adjusted life year averted and presents the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared to a threshold value. Model output is stratified by level of malaria transmission and the probability that a child would receive appropriate care from a health facility, to indicate the circumstances in which HMM is likely to be cost-effective. The model output suggests that the cost-effectiveness of HMM varies with malaria transmission, the probability of appropriate care, and the drug distributed. Where transmission is high and the probability of appropriate care is limited, HMM is likely to be cost-effective from a provider perspective. Even with the most effective antimalarials, HMM remains an attractive intervention only in areas of high malaria transmission and in medium transmission areas with a lower probability of appropriate care. HMM is generally not cost-effective in low transmission areas, regardless of which antimalarial is distributed. Considering the analysis from the societal perspective decreases the attractiveness of HMM.ConclusionSyndromic HMM for children with fever may be a useful strategy for higher transmission settings with limited health care and diagnosis, but is not appropriate for all settings. HMM may need to be tailored to specific settings, accounting for local malaria transmission intensity and availability of health services.

show abstract

Antimalarial efficacy of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, amodiaquine and a combination of chloroquine plus sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine in Bundi Bugyo, western Uganda

Cited by 33 publications

References 17 publications

Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial

Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial

Efficacy of chloroquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine and amodiaquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children under five in Bongor and Koumra, Chad

An Economic Evaluation of Home Management of Malaria in Uganda: An Interactive Markov Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About