1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(97)01254-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antilisterial activity of three bacteriocins used at sub minimal inhibitory concentrations and cross-resistance of the survivors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
24
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the IC 50 of nisin for the high-level-resistant mutants was the same as that for the wild type strains, in agreement with other reports (17,46). Cross-resistance between class IIa bacteriocins has been reported frequently (7,17,(46)(47)(48), but reports concerning crossresistance between bacteriocins of different classes contain contradictory results (7,11,41,46,47,52,54).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the IC 50 of nisin for the high-level-resistant mutants was the same as that for the wild type strains, in agreement with other reports (17,46). Cross-resistance between class IIa bacteriocins has been reported frequently (7,17,(46)(47)(48), but reports concerning crossresistance between bacteriocins of different classes contain contradictory results (7,11,41,46,47,52,54).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Various methods are used to determine differences in susceptibility to bacteriocins (6,16,18,38,40,42,47,52,60). To achieve high discrimination between strains with different susceptibilities, a standardized microtiter plate assay, performed with bacteriocin solutions of known concentrations, was used to provide data necessary to determine the potencies of the bacteriocins sakacin P, pediocin PA-1, sakacin A, and nisin against L. monocytogenes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…faecium was able to reduce the populations of present intestinal microflora in experimental birds, although this effect was especially remarkable after its first oral administration. Similarly, this type of inhibition kinetics has been observed before with Listeria as indicator and nisin, pediocin AcH and enterococcin EFS2 as antimicrobial substances (Song and Richard 1997), and may indicate that sensitive bacteria become resistant to the bacteriocin. It is generally admitted that each bacteriocin-sensitive bacterial population includes potentially tolerant and/or resistant cells with structural modifications or at least with a high predisposition to such modifications, which would allow them to spontaneously emerge in case of exposure to the bacteriocin (Hanlin et al 1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Cintas et al (1998) also reported pediocin to be more effective than nisin against some food borne pathogens such as L. monocytogenes. In case of all the bacterial strains it was observed that even when the bacteriocins displayed the most rapid inhibitory activity at 1 h, the survivors resumed growth, reaching the highest cell counts at 24 h. Similar observations were also made by Schillinger et al (1998), who reported a regrowth of survivors of L. monocytogenes Scott A after exposure to nisin concentrations between 10 and 500 IU/ml as well as with those of Song and Richard (1997), who observed that survivors of L. innocua resumed growth after the addition of nisin, pediocin AcH, and enterococcin EFS2 into TSBYE broth. According to Muriana (1996), several studies indicated the immediate decrease of target cells by one to three log cycles cfu/ml when a bacteriocin was added, with none or little effect on future inoculations.…”
Section: Kinetics Of Cell Growth Inhibition By Bacteriocinssupporting
confidence: 79%