2010
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2010.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of trandolapril/verapamil combination: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Both trandolapril and verapamil are effective and widely used antihypertensive agents. The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of trandolapril/ verapamil (Tr/Ve) combination for blood pressure control and renoprotection. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the criteria was performed. Twelve RCTs were ultimately included out of 62 studies. (3) Incidence of all-cause adverse events … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 However, the renoprotective effect of calcium channel blockers is contentious. [19][20][21][22] Conversely, the up-titration of doses of ARBs is likely to bring about beneficial results because of the protective effects of these drugs on the kidney, as supported by considerable evidence in the literature. Thus, the aim of the present study was to generate a hypothesis that up-titrating the dose of an ARB would be superior to combined treatment with an ARB plus a calcium channel blocker, with respect to renal protection for the same level of BP achieved and the same degree of BP reduction in patients, with albuminuria being treated with a standard dose of an ARB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…18 However, the renoprotective effect of calcium channel blockers is contentious. [19][20][21][22] Conversely, the up-titration of doses of ARBs is likely to bring about beneficial results because of the protective effects of these drugs on the kidney, as supported by considerable evidence in the literature. Thus, the aim of the present study was to generate a hypothesis that up-titrating the dose of an ARB would be superior to combined treatment with an ARB plus a calcium channel blocker, with respect to renal protection for the same level of BP achieved and the same degree of BP reduction in patients, with albuminuria being treated with a standard dose of an ARB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%