1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1997.d01-239.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigenic variation during malaria infection—the contribution from the murine parasite Plasmodium chabaudi

Abstract: P. chabaudi AS strain in laboratory mice provides an accessible and useful model for investigating antigenic variation in malaria parasites. Evidence that P. chabaudi AS undergoes antigenic variation is summarized. A live indirect fluorescent test (IFAT) detects a variable antigen on the surface of schizont-infected erythrocytes. Five different variable antigen types (VATS) (detected using the live IFAT) are described from a cloned mosquito transmitted parent population. Even during the rising primary parasita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the immune system of the host might respond differently to infection with slow-or fast-growing strains of parasite. Another possibility is that clonal antigenic switching of variant surface antigens may have occurred, as reported previously (1,14). Antigenic switching, possibly mediated by P. chabaudi cir genes (10), would enable a small number of parasites to survive strong immunity targeted against other antigens that do not switch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is possible that the immune system of the host might respond differently to infection with slow-or fast-growing strains of parasite. Another possibility is that clonal antigenic switching of variant surface antigens may have occurred, as reported previously (1,14). Antigenic switching, possibly mediated by P. chabaudi cir genes (10), would enable a small number of parasites to survive strong immunity targeted against other antigens that do not switch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The molecular weights of these recombinant antigens expressed in Sf 9 cells transfected with recombinant baculovirus or in E. coli were smaller than those of naive antigen. The difference of molecular weight between naive and recombinant antigens may be explained by the difference in parasite strains, the antigenic variation [2,12], or the lack of glycosilation of recombinant antigen. It should be noted that the gene sequence coding for the p26 was originally obtained from the Antwerp strain [16], whereas the genomic DNA used for PCR in the present study was obtained from the Australian strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytoadherence aside, there is strong evidence that antigenic variation per se allows the parasite to persist in the face of immunity (reviewed in Brown et al 1986;Phillips et al 1997). By expressing a novel antigen, the immune system is unable to recognize and destroy the parasite.…”
Section: (B) Antigenic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%