Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1982
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198207000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigenic Specificity of Antibody Reactive in the Antiglobulin-Augmented Lymphocytotoxicity Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with other centers, the histocompatibility techniques used for HLA typing, XM and detection of anti-HLA DSA in our center evolved during the study period (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) …”
Section: Hla Typing and Cross-match And Antibody Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with other centers, the histocompatibility techniques used for HLA typing, XM and detection of anti-HLA DSA in our center evolved during the study period (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) …”
Section: Hla Typing and Cross-match And Antibody Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 T-lymphocyte crossmatches were performed by using the standard microlymphocytotoxic dye exclusion method with the addition of the antiglobulin technique. 19 The diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection was based on positive blood cultures (Shell vial technique) and/or organ involvement (i.e., a positive tissue culture in association with a histologic finding of inclusion bodies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphocytotoxic antibody (LCA) testing to determine study eligibility was performed locally, and patients whose serum reacted with more than 20% of panel cells (PRA) were excluded. Plasma samples for LCA and antibody to amotosalen neoantigen testing were drawn weekly; baseline and end-of-study samples were analyzed at central laboratories for LCA by using standard techniques 31 and for antibodies to potential amotosalen neoantigens by using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Cerus, Concord, CA). 28 If the patient became platelet refractory, all samples from the patient were analyzed for LCA, antibody to amotosalen neoantigens, and plateletspecific alloantibodies 32,33 in central laboratories.…”
Section: Hemostatic Assessments and Laboratory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%