1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02090094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigenic differences in congenic chicken-colonizing and noncolonizing strains ofCampylobacter jejuni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, SF-1, displaying a motility similar to R 1 -V2, colonizes 1000-fold better than WT, and the completely nonmotile mutant R2 colonizes as efficiently as R1. The finding that motility is not required for colonization is in contrast to data from previous animal model studies (Newel1 et al, 1985;Morooka et al, 1985;Pavlovskis et a/., 1991). Possible explanations for this anomaly are the differences in the animal models and the motility mutants used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, SF-1, displaying a motility similar to R 1 -V2, colonizes 1000-fold better than WT, and the completely nonmotile mutant R2 colonizes as efficiently as R1. The finding that motility is not required for colonization is in contrast to data from previous animal model studies (Newel1 et al, 1985;Morooka et al, 1985;Pavlovskis et a/., 1991). Possible explanations for this anomaly are the differences in the animal models and the motility mutants used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Possible explanations for this anomaly are the differences in the animal models and the motility mutants used. Morooka et al (1985) and Newell et al (1985) used non-defined motility mutants and variants to demonstrate the importance of motility for colonization in a suckling mouse model. Such mutants may have had concomitant changes in other colonization factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations