2020
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12100631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigenic and Substrate Preference Differences between Scorpion and Spider Dermonecrotic Toxins, a Comparative Investigation

Abstract: The Hemiscorpius lepturus scorpion and brown spider Loxosceles intermedia represent a public health problem in Asia and America, respectively. Although distinct, these organisms contain similar toxins responsible for the principal clinical signs of envenomation. To better understand the properties of these toxins, we designed a study to compare recombinant Heminecrolysin (rHNC) and rLiD1, the major phospholipase D toxins of scorpion and spider venom, respectively. Using a competitive ELISA and a hemolytic inhi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrostatic interactions were treated using the particle-mesh Ewald algorithm with a cut-off of 10 Å. System minimization and equilibration were performed using the same protocol described in our previous work. , Three independent production simulations of 500 ns each were performed in the NPT ensemble at a temperature of 310 K and pressure control of 1 atm, totaling 1.5 μs of simulation time. The Langevin thermostat with a collision frequency of 5 ps –1 was used for temperature control, and pressure coupling was performed using isotropic position scaling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic interactions were treated using the particle-mesh Ewald algorithm with a cut-off of 10 Å. System minimization and equilibration were performed using the same protocol described in our previous work. , Three independent production simulations of 500 ns each were performed in the NPT ensemble at a temperature of 310 K and pressure control of 1 atm, totaling 1.5 μs of simulation time. The Langevin thermostat with a collision frequency of 5 ps –1 was used for temperature control, and pressure coupling was performed using isotropic position scaling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The α-clade PLD toxins strongly prefer sphingomyelin as a substrate to LPC or PC [ 14 , 30 ]. This high selectivity for sphingomyelin indicates a possible role in membrane disruption [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our study, the GPI-PLD, PC-PLD, and Loxosceles PLDs, which share distant homologies, are grouped as non-HKD enzymes, and plant and mammalian PXPH-PLD enzymes are grouped as HKD PLDs [ 33 , 40 , 42 ]. Citing that Loxosceles PLD with SMase activity had been classified as lacking HKD enzymes [ 42 ], and considering previous research in which comparing the recombinant phospholipase D toxins from Hemiscorpius and Loxosceles venom, the equal ability of these two PLDs for hydrolyzing lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and sphingomyelin was shown [ 43 ], so the scorpion PLD1 beta enzymes can be considered structurally and functionally homologous with most of the PLDs from Loxosceles (this must be proven experimentally), while scorpion PLD2 alpha is estimated to have similar functions to several members of mammalian PLDs that bear a PX domain and are represented by a duplicated HKD motif. It has been explained that these members of mammalian PLDs, in addition to lipase activity, hydrolyze phosphodiester bonds through the HKD catalytic motif [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%