2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05020.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigenic and cross-protection studies of biotype 1 and biotype 2 isolates of Yersinia ruckeri in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum)

Abstract: Aims:  The study investigated antigen characteristics of biotype (bt) 1 and bt 2 isolates of Yersinia ruckeri. Methods and Results:  The cell surface characteristics of Y. ruckeri were compared for their antigenic characteristics using polyclonal antibodies that revealed that both biotypes had a homogenous whole‐cell protein antigenic profile. Notable differences in the antigenic properties were observed in the lipopolysaccharide profile of both biotypes. Two iron‐regulated outer membrane proteins (IROMP) of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also notable that Y. ruckeri strains isolated from Atlantic salmon in Australia and Chile are also members of biotype 1 and not biotype 2 (7,9). It has been postulated that vaccination may be providing the selective pressure that is driving the loss of flagellar motility in Y. ruckeri (20,42). If this is the case, it is surprising that biotype 2 has emerged in rainbow trout but not in Atlantic salmon because Atlantic salmon are generally vaccinated with the same serotype O1-based vaccines as those used for rainbow trout (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is also notable that Y. ruckeri strains isolated from Atlantic salmon in Australia and Chile are also members of biotype 1 and not biotype 2 (7,9). It has been postulated that vaccination may be providing the selective pressure that is driving the loss of flagellar motility in Y. ruckeri (20,42). If this is the case, it is surprising that biotype 2 has emerged in rainbow trout but not in Atlantic salmon because Atlantic salmon are generally vaccinated with the same serotype O1-based vaccines as those used for rainbow trout (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scheme, five O serotypes, O1, O2, O5, O6, and O7, are recognized by rapid slide agglutination assay using defined O antigens (14); the individual O serotypes correspond to discrete lipopolysaccharide (LPS) types as identified by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (18). It is well established that serotype O1 strains of Y. ruckeri are responsible for the majority of disease outbreaks in rainbow trout worldwide (3,14,(19)(20)(21). However, yersiniosis of Atlantic salmon in Australia (7,8) and Chile (9) is associated with a serotype O1 subtype (O1b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disease was initially controlled by vaccines prepared with classical motile Y. ruckeri strains (Johnson & Amend 1983), but after appearance and spreading of non-motile variants, the vaccine failed to control infections in Europe (Austin et al 2003, Wheeler et al 2009) and the USA (Arias et al 2007). With the inclusion of both types of strains into the vaccine preparation, an enhancement of protection was achieved (Tinsley et al 2011), but despite the use of those bivalent vaccines, ERM outbreaks occurred in vaccinated Atlantic salmon in Chile (Bastardo et al 2011, Navas et al 2014 as well as in European rainbow trout stocks. In 4 trout farms from the present study, the stocks were vaccinated with a bivalent vaccine, and in 3 of these farms, ERM outbreaks caused by non-motile strains were observed during several sampling campaigns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 13 fish species have been found to be susceptible to infection by Y. ruckeri, as are some mammals (muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus) and birds (European herring gull, Larus argentatus). Humans (Homo sapiens) are also susceptible to this infection (Pêkala 2010, Tinsley 2010, Sudheesh et al 2012 (Koziñska and Pêkala 2004, Bernad 2013, Koziñska et al 2013, Pêkala et al 2015a, Bernad et al 2016a.…”
Section: Health Hazards In Fish Culturementioning
confidence: 99%