2021
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2686oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antigen-Specific T-Cell Activation Distinguishes between Recent and Remote Tuberculosis Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study focused on understanding T cell immunobiology during acquisition of M.tb infection and the discovery of potential biomarkers to distinguish between recent and remote M.tb infection. Development of a simplified assay to identify such individuals in clinical settings, including validation in a test cohort and performance as a marker of disease progression, are beyond the scope of this paper and were reported separately [43]. In this follow-up study [43], we showed that levels of HLA-DR expression on CFP-10/ESAT-6-specific T cells were not significantly different in TB patients compared to recently infected individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study focused on understanding T cell immunobiology during acquisition of M.tb infection and the discovery of potential biomarkers to distinguish between recent and remote M.tb infection. Development of a simplified assay to identify such individuals in clinical settings, including validation in a test cohort and performance as a marker of disease progression, are beyond the scope of this paper and were reported separately [43]. In this follow-up study [43], we showed that levels of HLA-DR expression on CFP-10/ESAT-6-specific T cells were not significantly different in TB patients compared to recently infected individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Development of a simplified assay to identify such individuals in clinical settings, including validation in a test cohort and performance as a marker of disease progression, are beyond the scope of this paper and were reported separately [43]. In this follow-up study [43], we showed that levels of HLA-DR expression on CFP-10/ESAT-6-specific T cells were not significantly different in TB patients compared to recently infected individuals. This observation further supports the hypothesis that T cell activation may track levels of in vivo antigen exposure, which is expected to be higher during recent M.tb infection and active disease compared to remote asymptomatic infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Last, HLA-DR expression on M. tuberculosis –specific CD4 + T cells has been shown to be a robust marker to distinguish active or subclinical TB from latent M. tuberculosis infection, regardless of HIV infection ( 46 , 47 ). Thus, to define whether COVID-19 can promote M. tuberculosis reactivation, we compared the expression of HLA-DR on M. tuberculosis –specific CD4 + T cells in the different cohorts ( Figure 7D ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not possible to state if TB therapy induced a protective cytokine profile in TBI-IMID; however, these patients have been followed for 6 years and none of them developed until now active-TB disease. Since the phenotype studied based on CD45RA and CD27 did not allow to define a particular profile over time, we may need to better characterize the response using also other activation markers such as HLA-DR ( 29 , 60 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%