2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antifungal susceptibilities of non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi causing invasive infection in Australia: support for current antifungal guideline recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, while we agree that the SYO microdilution panel offers a practical alternative to the reference (CLSI or EUCAST) method for antifungal susceptibility testing of molds (16), clinical microbiologists who use SYO in the routine setting, as we do, are required to compare the MIC mode and range data for each mold species tested in their own laboratory with the MIC distributions freely available on line or in the published literature (9). This would guarantee that MIC endpoints generated in the laboratory for each mold species would mirror those of the reference antifungal susceptibility testing methods and thus would be able to be correctly used for clinical purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultimately, while we agree that the SYO microdilution panel offers a practical alternative to the reference (CLSI or EUCAST) method for antifungal susceptibility testing of molds (16), clinical microbiologists who use SYO in the routine setting, as we do, are required to compare the MIC mode and range data for each mold species tested in their own laboratory with the MIC distributions freely available on line or in the published literature (9). This would guarantee that MIC endpoints generated in the laboratory for each mold species would mirror those of the reference antifungal susceptibility testing methods and thus would be able to be correctly used for clinical purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Whereas we have shown previously that the SYO microdilution panel-with which amphotericin B, echinocandins, and triazoles can be tested in parallel-is a reliable tool for antifungal resistance surveillance in Candida species (14), only limited data have been reported for Aspergillus (and other mold) species (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…311 VCZ is the most active agent in vitro against Scedosporium; 311,312 POSA and micafungin have moderate activity. 311,313 Significant interspecies differences in activity exist; S. prolificans is the most resistant species to medical therapy. 311,313 ECMM and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines recommend VCZ as the first-line therapy for scedosporiosis; surgical debridement or removal of affected tissue may be helpful as adjunctive therapy in some cases.…”
Section: Treatment Of Scedosporiosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality rates of up to 90% are associated with these infections . Treatment of invasive infections is challenging as L prolificans isolates are often pan‐drug resistant, with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against all available antifungal agents . More than 10 years ago, two relatively large studies reported that voriconazole was associated with survival rates between 44% and 66% and voriconazole was deemed the treatment of choice for invasive L prolificans infections .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%