2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-022-4095-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antifouling Hydrophilic Electrostatic Spinning PAN Membrane Based on Click Chemistry with High Efficiency Oil-water Separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…constructed two kinds of hydrophilic and underwater oleophobic membranes, namely DMDAAC‐PAN (DPAN) and SPE‐PAN, by the electrostatic spinning of PAN with γ‐mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane to generate the MPAN membrane, and grafting dimethyldiallylammonium chloride monomers (DMDAAC)/3‐[ N , N ‐dimethyl‐[2‐(2‐methylprop‐2‐enoyloxy)ethyl]ammonium]propane‐1‐sulfonate inner salt (SPE) through thiol‐ene click chemistry. [ 71 ] For surfactant‐free emulsions and surfactant‐stabilized emulsions, the DPAN membrane exhibited higher permeate flux and superior separation efficiency compared to PAN and MPAN membranes, attributed to the formation of a hydration layer preventing oil droplets from blocking membrane surface. The SPE‐PAN membrane exhibited high pure water flux up to 787 L·m −2 ·h −1 , and good antifouling effect with a flux recovery rate of 94%.…”
Section: Advances In Liquid Separation Membranes Based On Thiol‐ene C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…constructed two kinds of hydrophilic and underwater oleophobic membranes, namely DMDAAC‐PAN (DPAN) and SPE‐PAN, by the electrostatic spinning of PAN with γ‐mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane to generate the MPAN membrane, and grafting dimethyldiallylammonium chloride monomers (DMDAAC)/3‐[ N , N ‐dimethyl‐[2‐(2‐methylprop‐2‐enoyloxy)ethyl]ammonium]propane‐1‐sulfonate inner salt (SPE) through thiol‐ene click chemistry. [ 71 ] For surfactant‐free emulsions and surfactant‐stabilized emulsions, the DPAN membrane exhibited higher permeate flux and superior separation efficiency compared to PAN and MPAN membranes, attributed to the formation of a hydration layer preventing oil droplets from blocking membrane surface. The SPE‐PAN membrane exhibited high pure water flux up to 787 L·m −2 ·h −1 , and good antifouling effect with a flux recovery rate of 94%.…”
Section: Advances In Liquid Separation Membranes Based On Thiol‐ene C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing inspiration from the lotus leaf, superhydrophobicity is typically attained through materials with low surface energy or by engineering the surface morphology of materials . The electrostatically spun nanofiber membrane represents a promising avenue for efficient oil–water separation, attributable to its elevated porosity, extensive specific surface area, and robust spatial connectivity. Currently, a diverse array of polymers, including poly­(acrylonitrile), polyimide, poly­(phenylene sulfide), poly­(vinylidene fluoride), polyurethane, and polypropylene, have been investigated for the preparation of nanofiber membranes via electrostatic spinning, aimed at oil–water separation. Nevertheless, due to the nondegradable nature of these materials, the disposal of fiber membranes after oil–water separation introduces other environmental pollution challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, electrospun fibrous membranes prepared by electrospinning have become an ideal choice for oilin-water separation because of their structural features such as smaller fiber diameter, high porosity (>80%), 12 and good pore connectivity. Currently, a series of electrospun fibrous membranes were fabricated by polymers such as poly (vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) 13,14 and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) 15,16 etc for oil-in-water separation, which showed robust permeation fluxes. Despite their outstanding potential, the majority of these electrospun fibrous films are still subjected to low separation efficiency for oil-in-water emulsions with submicrometer oil droplets as a result of their relatively large pore size (>1 μm) attributed to pseudo-nanoscale diameters (>100 nm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%