1982
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.51.1412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiferromagnetic vs Spin-Peierls State in 1-D Heisenberg Antiferromagnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Þ: It is found that there is no suppression of the order parameters near the phase boundary. These results are essentially the same as obtained from the mean-filed approximation [7][8][9]. Even if one includes electronic fluctuation effects due to the ðq x f þ Þðq x f À Þ and cos 2f terms in Eq.…”
Section: Classical Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Þ: It is found that there is no suppression of the order parameters near the phase boundary. These results are essentially the same as obtained from the mean-filed approximation [7][8][9]. Even if one includes electronic fluctuation effects due to the ðq x f þ Þðq x f À Þ and cos 2f terms in Eq.…”
Section: Classical Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In order to investigate the competition between the SP and AF states theoretically, Kondo and Kinoshita [7], Kondo [8], Inagaki and Fukuyama [9], and Caron et al [10] investigated models within classical treatment of phonon and obtained a first-order phase transition between the SP state and the AF state. However, it seems that such a transition is different from that observed experimentally in the ðTMTTFÞ 2 PF 6 [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%