2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012775.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 293 publications
0
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, network meta-analysis (NMA) can provide direct and indirect comparisons among multiple interventions. 22 Therefore, this study attempts to compare the effects of different modalities of rTMS on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke through NMA with both direct and indirect evidence. The first research question is: what isthe most effective rTMS modality on upper limb movement function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke?…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, network meta-analysis (NMA) can provide direct and indirect comparisons among multiple interventions. 22 Therefore, this study attempts to compare the effects of different modalities of rTMS on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke through NMA with both direct and indirect evidence. The first research question is: what isthe most effective rTMS modality on upper limb movement function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke?…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limited by the availability of pairwise comparisons between interventions, it is difficult to draw a conclusion about which is the most comparatively effective and safe stimulation modalities. In this case, network meta-analysis (NMA) can provide direct and indirect comparisons among multiple interventions 22. Therefore, this study attempts to compare the effects of different modalities of rTMS on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke through NMA with both direct and indirect evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NK1 receptor antagonists are highly effective for treatment of nausea and vomiting, including highly emetogenic chemotherapy and post-operative nausea and vomiting as documented in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [2][3][4] These effects are predominantly attributed to effects on NK1 receptors in the vomiting centre in the brainstem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, tachykinins can inhibit motor activity by stimulating either inhibitory neuronal pathways or interrupting excitatory relays 1 . Therefore, the effects of an NK1 antagonist on regional gastrointestinal motor functions cannot be accurately predicted, and formal studies are needed to assess the potential pharmacodynamic effects of such pharmacological agents. NK1 receptor antagonists are highly effective for treatment of nausea and vomiting, including highly emetogenic chemotherapy and post‐operative nausea and vomiting as documented in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses 2–4 . These effects are predominantly attributed to effects on NK1 receptors in the vomiting centre in the brainstem. A review has summarised the important effects of NK receptor modulation on the neuromuscular apparatus in the gastrointestinal tract 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, beware of catecholamine-induced QTc prolongation and avoid 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists as the QTc interval approaches >500 ms [17]. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (e.g., aprepitant) which antagonize the binding of substance P, though costly, may be particularly useful as an antiemetic in these patients, as chromaffin tumors may secrete substance P [18][19][20].…”
Section: Catecholamine Excess and Management: Gastrointestinal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%