1995
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.152.4.564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antidepressant and cognitive effects of twice- versus three-times- weekly ECT

Abstract: ECT twice a week is an effective schedule for clinical practice and is potentially advantageous in view of a therapeutic outcome identical to that of ECT three times a week and less severe cognitive effects. ECT three times a week may be specifically indicated when early onset of clinical effect is of primary importance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now well established that certain ECT treatment factors are critically related to both the severity and type of cognitive side effects experienced by patients. For example, the use of higher electrical dose ( Ottosson, 1960 ; Sackeim et al, 1993 ; McCall et al, 2000 ; Quante et al, 2011 ), increased frequency of treatments ( Lerer et al, 1995 ), and choice of stimulus parameters, including use of sine wave stimulation ( Sackeim et al, 2007 ) and brief-pulse instead of “ultrabrief” pulse width stimulus ( Sackeim et al, 2008 ; Loo et al, 2014 ; Tor et al, in press), have been demonstrated to be associated with increased cognitive side effects. In addition, the choice of ECT electrode placements is important, as montages that minimize the degree of temporal lobe stimulation, including right unilateral (RUL), have been found beneficial for reducing memory side effects ( Sackeim et al, 1993 ; Sobin et al, 1995 ; Dunne and McLoughlin, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now well established that certain ECT treatment factors are critically related to both the severity and type of cognitive side effects experienced by patients. For example, the use of higher electrical dose ( Ottosson, 1960 ; Sackeim et al, 1993 ; McCall et al, 2000 ; Quante et al, 2011 ), increased frequency of treatments ( Lerer et al, 1995 ), and choice of stimulus parameters, including use of sine wave stimulation ( Sackeim et al, 2007 ) and brief-pulse instead of “ultrabrief” pulse width stimulus ( Sackeim et al, 2008 ; Loo et al, 2014 ; Tor et al, in press), have been demonstrated to be associated with increased cognitive side effects. In addition, the choice of ECT electrode placements is important, as montages that minimize the degree of temporal lobe stimulation, including right unilateral (RUL), have been found beneficial for reducing memory side effects ( Sackeim et al, 1993 ; Sobin et al, 1995 ; Dunne and McLoughlin, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electroconvulsive therapy is a common physical therapy in the department of psychiatric diseases (Rey and Walter 1997 ), but the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of electric shock therapy is still unclear although it has definite therapeutic efficacy (Danese 2006 ). A majority of investigators have investigated the brain dysfunction secondary to ECT or MECT, but studies are mainly confined to imaging examinations and psychological examinations (Lerer et al 1995 ; Wengel et al 1998 ; Barnes et al 1997 ). The brain function is mainly evaluated by EEG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per hospital protocol, if individuals experience cognitive impairment based on routine clinical evaluation with right unilateral or bilateral ECT during thrice a week sessions, ECT treatments may be performed twice a week ( 94 ). Cognitive impairment determined during routine clinical practice will be based on history and bedside clinical examination.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%