Abstract:Thromboembolism in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) represents a common cause of morbidity and mortality. In this article, the authors analyse the use of anticoagulants for patients with PAD. Anticoagulants have been used to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism, but have recently been applied to the arterial circulation. Heparins were introduced to reduce short-term major adverse limb events in patients undergoing arterial revascularisation. Low molecular weight heparins have allowed easier m… Show more
“…76 Regarding dabigatran and apixaban, there is a limited long -term or randomized evidence supporting their use in the patients with PAD. 77 From a clinical point of view, daily use of low-dose DOACs along with aspirin in stable and postrevascularization elderly PAD patients with AF at a low or intermediate risk for bleeding and without indications for full-dose long--term OAC treatment seems a rather safe and effective approach. 78 However, the optimal OAC strategy for the elderly patients with PAD is still characterized by a notable lack of consensus guidelines and large regional disparity in treatment patterns.…”
Oral anticoagulation challenges and dilemmas in the very elderly 1 end, joint approaches from international working groups aimed to practically guide the anticoagulation decisions based on the existing observational data and despite the absence of an established threshold to define "elderly" and "very elderly." 4 Nevertheless, current evidence mostly concerns elderly populations (65-79 years of age), while very elderly populations (≥ 80 years of age) have been under -represented. 2 Given the rapid aging of the global population and great heterogeneity of the very elderly population, the current review aims at gathering and critically appraising the existing literature on the anticoagulation -related outcomes in octogenarians and nonagenarians with cardiovascular disease in need of OAC.Aging and organ function An ancient Greek saying warns "Fear old age, for it never comes alone."Introduction The positive correlation of age with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including bleeding and thromboembolism, has been long established. 1 The aging -induced organ dysfunction, along with the usually occurring multimorbidity and polypharmacy, create a critical conundrum over whether the anticoagulation benefits outweigh the bleeding risks. In real -world clinical practice, oral anticoagulation (OAC) drugs are usually suboptimally prescribed in elderly and very elderly patients in need of anticoagulation due to the fear of bleeding and the lack of specific randomized trials and guidelines. 2 The risk factors for ischemic and bleeding events often coexist, and bleeding episodes seem to account for higher mortality rates. 3 Hence, the development of individualized recommendations is particularly important in this setting. To that
“…76 Regarding dabigatran and apixaban, there is a limited long -term or randomized evidence supporting their use in the patients with PAD. 77 From a clinical point of view, daily use of low-dose DOACs along with aspirin in stable and postrevascularization elderly PAD patients with AF at a low or intermediate risk for bleeding and without indications for full-dose long--term OAC treatment seems a rather safe and effective approach. 78 However, the optimal OAC strategy for the elderly patients with PAD is still characterized by a notable lack of consensus guidelines and large regional disparity in treatment patterns.…”
Oral anticoagulation challenges and dilemmas in the very elderly 1 end, joint approaches from international working groups aimed to practically guide the anticoagulation decisions based on the existing observational data and despite the absence of an established threshold to define "elderly" and "very elderly." 4 Nevertheless, current evidence mostly concerns elderly populations (65-79 years of age), while very elderly populations (≥ 80 years of age) have been under -represented. 2 Given the rapid aging of the global population and great heterogeneity of the very elderly population, the current review aims at gathering and critically appraising the existing literature on the anticoagulation -related outcomes in octogenarians and nonagenarians with cardiovascular disease in need of OAC.Aging and organ function An ancient Greek saying warns "Fear old age, for it never comes alone."Introduction The positive correlation of age with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including bleeding and thromboembolism, has been long established. 1 The aging -induced organ dysfunction, along with the usually occurring multimorbidity and polypharmacy, create a critical conundrum over whether the anticoagulation benefits outweigh the bleeding risks. In real -world clinical practice, oral anticoagulation (OAC) drugs are usually suboptimally prescribed in elderly and very elderly patients in need of anticoagulation due to the fear of bleeding and the lack of specific randomized trials and guidelines. 2 The risk factors for ischemic and bleeding events often coexist, and bleeding episodes seem to account for higher mortality rates. 3 Hence, the development of individualized recommendations is particularly important in this setting. To that
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.