2002
DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960251003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: Why is the treatment rate so low?

Abstract: Summary:The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing in many countries along with aging demographics. Atrial fibrillation is clearly associated with an increased rate of stroke. Numerous large clinical trials have shown that dose-adjusted warfarin can reduce the stroke rate in these patients, particularly in the elderly, and clear guidelines for the use of anticoagulants in such patients have been published. However, many studies show that treatment rates remain disappointingly low (≤ 50%). Numerous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…OACs (and their attendant monitoring) account for a large portion of AF-related costs. 148 Nevertheless, despite strong evidence of efficacy, OAC use is limited by nonprescription (≈50% patients do not receive OAC, despite an appropriate indication), 159,160 nonadherence (30% 1-year discontinuation for warfarin), 161 and subtherapeutic dosing (≈25%-38% of warfarin-treated patients). 162,163 Suboptimal therapy is costly as a result of the economic burden associated with excess stroke, an observation that is particularly relevant in the case of AF-associated strokes.…”
Section: Stroke Prevention and Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…OACs (and their attendant monitoring) account for a large portion of AF-related costs. 148 Nevertheless, despite strong evidence of efficacy, OAC use is limited by nonprescription (≈50% patients do not receive OAC, despite an appropriate indication), 159,160 nonadherence (30% 1-year discontinuation for warfarin), 161 and subtherapeutic dosing (≈25%-38% of warfarin-treated patients). 162,163 Suboptimal therapy is costly as a result of the economic burden associated with excess stroke, an observation that is particularly relevant in the case of AF-associated strokes.…”
Section: Stroke Prevention and Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, screening patients with known PAF can also be of relevance regarding anticoagulation management. Many AF patients are not treated with OAC despite a CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score > 1 and missing contraindications [20]. In our study, 18 (51.4%) patients with known PAF and a CHA 2 -DS 2 VASc score > 1 (n = 35, 67.3%) did not receive OAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, several abstract barriers such as "non-compliance", "age", and "dementia" are noted in the literature; we were interested in understanding the underlying reasons that these factors posed as barriers to anticoagulant use [5,16,21]. Our goal was to develop a questionnaire to assess barriers to anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in AF patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have cited reasons for underutilization of warfarin such as age, disability, confusion, cancer, fall risk, and gastrointestinal bleeding in a given patient population [5,7]. In addition, surveys of perceived physician barriers have also been conducted with some examining the barriers at a patient-level using clinical vignettes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, there are numerous limitations to this prior work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%