1983
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198312000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticoagulant Monitoring and Neutralization during Open Heart Surgery???A Rapid Method for Measuring Heparin and Calculating Safe Reduced Protamine Doses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we did not measure plasma concentrations of heparin that mobilized chemokines but not IFN-␥ in our patients, circulating levels of heparin have been measured at 24 to 70 g/mL before CPB and Ͻ1.5 g/mL after protamine administration. 19 It is possible that at concentrations used clinically, heparin may selectively modulate chemokine but not IFN-␥ activity. We also speculate that an excessive release of free chemokines when heparin activity is too rapidly reversed with ϩ memory T cells per cross section (x-sec) within the intima and whole vessel (A-C) and for the intima and total vessel areas (D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did not measure plasma concentrations of heparin that mobilized chemokines but not IFN-␥ in our patients, circulating levels of heparin have been measured at 24 to 70 g/mL before CPB and Ͻ1.5 g/mL after protamine administration. 19 It is possible that at concentrations used clinically, heparin may selectively modulate chemokine but not IFN-␥ activity. We also speculate that an excessive release of free chemokines when heparin activity is too rapidly reversed with ϩ memory T cells per cross section (x-sec) within the intima and whole vessel (A-C) and for the intima and total vessel areas (D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forman and Bayer 14 recommend this procedure for all forms of heparin treatment and Esposito et al 12 found the ACT "as the best available measurement for anticoagulation" during CPB. Others, 42,46,47 in contrast, advocate the use of quantitative heparin assays during CPB, not only to avoid occasional "false" ACT values due to changes in the clotting system, especially very high Factor VIII:C levels, but also monitor more precisely heparin during CPB and more accurately calculate the dose of protamine sulfate needed to neutralize heparin. Pro tamine in excess apparently can have considerable side effects on the cardiovascular system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 Hardy et al found a large bias (mean Ϯ SD difference between values was 1.45 Ϯ 1.65 U/ml) between measurements derived from the automated protamine titration method and from anti-Xa measurements. 103 Although the Protopath system provides accurate plasma heparin concentration measurements, 104 its clinical usefulness is limited by the lack of clot-formation detection, the need for considerable technical expertise in assay standardization, the need to convert plasma heparin concentration values to whole blood equivalent values when determining protamine dose, and by equipment calibration and maintenance requirements. Although the exact relation between whole blood (automated protamine titration assay) and plasma (anti-Xa chromogenic) heparin levels needs further investigation, another recent study showed that patient-specific heparin concentrations can be maintained using the automated protamine titration assay.…”
Section: Heparin Concentration Assays Automated Protamine Titration Mmentioning
confidence: 99%