2020
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticipating the Impact of the USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Scoring Decision on Underrepresented-in-Medicine Students

Abstract: Three-digit United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores have assumed an outsized role in residency selection decisions, creating intense pressure for medical students to obtain a high score on this exam. In February 2020, the Federation of State Medical Boards and the National Board of Medical Examiners announced that Step 1 would transition to pass/fail scoring beginning in 2022. The authors discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of the pass/fail scoring change for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we asked about students skipping these activities to quantify the impact, we believe this underrepresents the level of disengagement toward these topics as students may have chosen to be physically present at a lecture but review Step 1 practice questions rather than attend to the lecture's content. Our findings are limited in that they do not clarify the exacerbated implications of USMLE exam preparation on international medical graduates, students from underrepresented in medicine (URiM) groups, and trainees from other marginalized backgrounds, which have been discussed in other recent works [14,15]. Finally, while we have described the extent to which students disengage from the UNMC curriculum in order to study for Step 1, our study was not designed to evaluate the adequacy of UNMC's preclinical curriculum to train young physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Although we asked about students skipping these activities to quantify the impact, we believe this underrepresents the level of disengagement toward these topics as students may have chosen to be physically present at a lecture but review Step 1 practice questions rather than attend to the lecture's content. Our findings are limited in that they do not clarify the exacerbated implications of USMLE exam preparation on international medical graduates, students from underrepresented in medicine (URiM) groups, and trainees from other marginalized backgrounds, which have been discussed in other recent works [14,15]. Finally, while we have described the extent to which students disengage from the UNMC curriculum in order to study for Step 1, our study was not designed to evaluate the adequacy of UNMC's preclinical curriculum to train young physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Under this premise, the upcoming change to the USMLE Step 1 scoring system may tilt the balance in favor of racial and gender diversity in our field. 9 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underrepresented‐in‐medicine students are also subject to structural bias in standardized testing. Educational inequities, systemic racism, household income disparities, and housing insecurities have all been shown to negatively influence the standardized test scores of URiM students 15 . Using the USMLE to screen residency applicants becomes increasingly problematic as Step 1 scores are not a reliable predictor of residency success 15 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational inequities, systemic racism, household income disparities, and housing insecurities have all been shown to negatively influence the standardized test scores of URiM students 15 . Using the USMLE to screen residency applicants becomes increasingly problematic as Step 1 scores are not a reliable predictor of residency success 15 . Obstetrics/gynecology literature demonstrated that while testing scores predicted rank on the residency program match list and matching success, they failed to correlate with residency performance 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation