2013
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2013.832749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticipating intended users: prospective sensemaking in technology development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizational actors make sense of past, present and future by way of narration, and shape the future by way of story-telling (Beigi, Callahan, & Michaelson, 2019;Boje, 1991;Boyce, 1996;Colón-Aguirre, 2015;Gabriel, 2000). Examples include the focus on how narratives and 'prospective sensemaking' 2 shape innovation and technology implementation (Jacobs, Steyaert, & Ueberbacher, 2013;Krogh, 2018) and the role and dynamics of storylines and future scenarios in environmental governance (Garb, Pulver, & Vandeveer, 2008).…”
Section: Narratives Numbers and Digital Traces As Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational actors make sense of past, present and future by way of narration, and shape the future by way of story-telling (Beigi, Callahan, & Michaelson, 2019;Boje, 1991;Boyce, 1996;Colón-Aguirre, 2015;Gabriel, 2000). Examples include the focus on how narratives and 'prospective sensemaking' 2 shape innovation and technology implementation (Jacobs, Steyaert, & Ueberbacher, 2013;Krogh, 2018) and the role and dynamics of storylines and future scenarios in environmental governance (Garb, Pulver, & Vandeveer, 2008).…”
Section: Narratives Numbers and Digital Traces As Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if development teams are able to identify a need to be fulfilled in the future life of customers, then the objective is set, and the process is driven accordingly (Jacobs et al, 2013).…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging from reviewing the articles that adopt a 'designing the right application' perspective to technological development in an iterative approach is that traditional stage-gate is no longer the only option to manage this complex process (Cooper and Sommer, 2016), and that technology should be considered an enabler of new product development (Drejer and Riis, 1999;Xu et al, 2012). Indeed, the process is more iterative when technology is considered an enabler, as it is co-developed with the product, and thus characterized by several feedback loops (Jacobs et al, 2013). In this iterative process, scholars highlight that networks are not only a relevant and crucial aspect, but the roles of the different stakeholders in the network are also fundamental (Kirchberger and Pohl, 2016).…”
Section: Designing the Right Application In An Iterative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods to improve technology management that have already been developed during previous research [22][23][24][25][26][27] could be implemented in the eighth step of this behavioral change model. New research could address the seven preceding steps, which need to be taken to facilitate use of these methods by adults who are institutionalized in the irresponsible adolescent behaviors of hype cycles.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For brevity, these can be referred to as hype cycles. Hitherto, studies have reported hype cycles for many different technologies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and studies have proposed different methods for improving the introduction of technological innovations [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%