Anticipated embarrassment due to social presence withholds consumers from purchasing products that feature a lucky charm

Abstract

Purpose Several studies have shown that superstitious beliefs, such as beliefs in “lucky” product attributes, influence consumer purchase behaviour. Still, little is known about how social influence, in particular mere social presence, impacts consumer superstition-related purchase decisions. Drawing on impression management theory, this paper aims to investigate the effect of social presence on consumer purchase decisions of products featuring lucky charms including the role of anticipated embarrassment as a mediator of the social presence effect. Design/methodology/approach In three studies, participants select products that feature or do not feature a lucky charm. They make these selections under varying conditions of social presence, as induced by the shopping setting in the scenario or through the use of confederates or fellow participants observing them make a real product selection. Participants are students from Australia and China. Findings The studies show that social presence makes consumers less likely to select products that feature a lucky charm. This suppressing effect is mediated by the consumers’ anticipated embarrassment. Research limitations/implications The study investigates the effect of social presence but does not investigate different parameters of social presence such as the number of people present and their familiarity. The study investigates effects for purchase settings but does not include effects of usage and neither does it look into differences across product types or lucky charm types. Practical implications Marketers should be careful to not make lucky charms too publicly salient. Online settings are more suitable than mortar-and-brick settings for selling products featuring a lucky charm. Originality/value The present research is the first to investigate consumer purchase behaviour for a product featuring a lucky charm. It is also the first to investigate the impact of social influence on superstition-based decision-making.

Do Discount Presentations Influence Gift Purchase Intentions and Attitudes of Chinese Outbound Tourists?

“…For example, our findings may not be applied to groups of tourists. As prior findings have shown that purchasing products featuring “lucky” attributes is embarrassing in social settings (Wang, Oppewal, and Thomas 2017), our results may be weaker for group tourists. Our findings may not apply to destination retailers in Eastern countries, such as Singapore, where Chinese culture has a strong influence on domestic culture, as Chinese tourists can attribute the use of “88” as a norm in their own culture and not as an acknowledgment of Chinese culture.…”

Purchasing luck: The impact of scarcity cues on superstitious behavior

“…Given consumer superstitiousness as a typical case of irrational behavior, the present research attempts to systematically examine the impact of scarcity on a specific case of consumer superstitiousness, that is, preferences for lucky products. In this paper, we refer to product or product-related elements with positive superstitious associations as lucky products (Kramer & Block, 2008), and they are not limited to lucky symbols (e.g., lucky charms; Wang, Oppewal, & Thomas, 2017) but can include any product with attributes eliciting positive superstitious beliefs (e.g., products with lucky numbers).…”

Why buy used? Motivators and barriers for re-commerce luxury fashion

“…, 2010), have been found to influence both purchasing behavior and economic activity (Jian Wang et al. , 2009; Wang et al. , 2017).…”

“…, 2009). Interestingly, social presence has been found to weaken the role of superstitious beliefs when shopping, with embarrassment acting as a mediator that suppresses the impact of these views (Wang et al. , 2017).…”