2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticancer nanomedicine and tumor vascular permeability; Where is the missing link?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
215
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(145 reference statements)
2
215
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate the potential of ACT concept to deliver a drug payload locally and specifically to targeted tumor tissue. This speed and extent into solid tumors have not been observed before for a hydrophobic drug [25][26]. From its local release and deposition characteristics, we hypothesize that the ACT concept, and its microscale phase transition attributes, may play a deterministic role in future hydrophobic drug release kinetics.…”
Section: Act Mediated Delivery and Uptake Of Lipophilic Carbocyanine mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These results demonstrate the potential of ACT concept to deliver a drug payload locally and specifically to targeted tumor tissue. This speed and extent into solid tumors have not been observed before for a hydrophobic drug [25][26]. From its local release and deposition characteristics, we hypothesize that the ACT concept, and its microscale phase transition attributes, may play a deterministic role in future hydrophobic drug release kinetics.…”
Section: Act Mediated Delivery and Uptake Of Lipophilic Carbocyanine mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In essence, such mechanisms would represent an enhancement of the natural EPR effect. Targeting cancer cells using only EPR is not always a feasible strategy; the degree of tumor vascularization and porosity of tumor vessels can vary with the tumor type, status, and even throughout the same lesion [3,[30][31][32][33][34]. As the ACT concept mechanically modulates the vascular permeability and the interstitium, heterogeneity of the EPR effect, effectively hindering sufficient tumor delivery, may be circumvented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And even within a single tumor, certain vessels are significantly more leaky than others. Several recent reviews critically describe and comprehensively discuss the validity and the variability of the EPR effect [9][10][11][12][13][14]. To better understand EPR, to predict which animal models or patient tumors are likely to benefit from EPR-mediated passive drug targeting, and to thereby individualize and improve nano-chemotherapeutic treatments, it therefore seems highly important to identify imageable parameters to characterize the EPR effect.…”
Section: : Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%