2013
DOI: 10.3747/co.21.1661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anticancer activity of combination targeted therapy using cetuximab plus vemurafenib for refractory BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Abstract: colorectal cancers have responded to braf kinase inhibitor monotherapy in early-phase trials 14 , raising the possibility that effective treatment may require blockade of one or more additional pathways 15 . Conversely, the clinical response of colorectal cancers to regimens including epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr) inhibitors appears to require both wild-type BRAF and KRAS status [16][17][18] .Because recent laboratory studies have confirmed that de novo resistance to braf inhibitors in BRAF V600E -mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a phase III trial of 675 melanoma patients, the vemurafenib response rate was 57%, compared to 9% with standard dacarbazine treatment, and progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients receiving vemurafenib (6.9 months vs 1.6 months in the control arm) (50). However, some BRAF(V600E) positive cancers, including colorectal cancer, are inherently resistant to BRAF inhibitors (51), and even initially sensitive tumors adeptly develop vemurafenib resistance. Ongoing trials seek to delay resistance via co-administration with other drugs, including other MAPK pathway inhibitors(29,52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a phase III trial of 675 melanoma patients, the vemurafenib response rate was 57%, compared to 9% with standard dacarbazine treatment, and progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients receiving vemurafenib (6.9 months vs 1.6 months in the control arm) (50). However, some BRAF(V600E) positive cancers, including colorectal cancer, are inherently resistant to BRAF inhibitors (51), and even initially sensitive tumors adeptly develop vemurafenib resistance. Ongoing trials seek to delay resistance via co-administration with other drugs, including other MAPK pathway inhibitors(29,52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches prevent compensatory feedback loops and crosstalk, which currently limit the use of B-Raf inhibitors as single agents (4,(19)(20)(21). These preclinical drug combinations initiated several clinical trials that are currently ongoing (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and a first case report further demonstrates the utility of such combinations (22). However, to interpret the effect of such combinatorial approaches, it is necessary to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of their effects as monosubstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of efficacy seems to suggest that the biology of BRAF activation in patients with CRC is more heterogeneous than that in melanoma. As a matter of fact, a feedback activation of EGFR on BRAF inhibition, leading to EGFR-dependent compensatory signals, has been indicated as one of the main mechanisms of vemurafenib failure [43][44][45].…”
Section: Primary and Acquired Resistance To Egfr Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%