“…According to data provided by Dimeglio et al [11], sufficient protection of 89% can be obtained with a neutralizing antibody level of 141 BAU/mL, which is approximately ten times the level considered in this study as the limit for positive results. In our study, only 64% of vaccinated people with no history of COVID-19 exceeded this anti-S antibody level, in contrast to 90% of those with a history of the disease.…”
The current study aimed to determine to what extent prior COVID-19 infection affects the response of specific antibodies following vaccination. The study involved 173 healthcare professionals who completed the two-dose vaccination course with BNT162b2, including 40 who previously experienced clinical COVID-19. The levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1S2 IgG (anti-S) and, in some cases, anti-SARS-CoV-S-RBD IgG (anti-S-RBD) were determined six months after complete vaccination. A level exceeding the cut-off values for both anti-S and anti-S-RBD was observed in 100% of subjects, but after setting the analysis to 5- and 10-fold cut-off levels, the percentage of subjects meeting this criterion was significantly higher for anti-S-RBD. The 100-fold cut-off level was achieved by only 21% and 16% for anti-S and anti-S-RBD, respectively. Anti-S and anti-S-RBD levels above ten times the positive cut-off were respectively observed in 91% and 100% individuals with a history of COVID-19, while among those without COVID-19, these values were 64% and 90%, respectively. Significantly higher incidence of values above 10 and 100 times the cut-off became apparent among people with a history of COVID-19. In conclusion, vaccination against COVID-19 following infection with the disease provides higher levels of specific antibodies 6 months after vaccination than those of individuals without a history of the disease, which supports the use of a booster dose, particularly for those who have not experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“…According to data provided by Dimeglio et al [11], sufficient protection of 89% can be obtained with a neutralizing antibody level of 141 BAU/mL, which is approximately ten times the level considered in this study as the limit for positive results. In our study, only 64% of vaccinated people with no history of COVID-19 exceeded this anti-S antibody level, in contrast to 90% of those with a history of the disease.…”
The current study aimed to determine to what extent prior COVID-19 infection affects the response of specific antibodies following vaccination. The study involved 173 healthcare professionals who completed the two-dose vaccination course with BNT162b2, including 40 who previously experienced clinical COVID-19. The levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1S2 IgG (anti-S) and, in some cases, anti-SARS-CoV-S-RBD IgG (anti-S-RBD) were determined six months after complete vaccination. A level exceeding the cut-off values for both anti-S and anti-S-RBD was observed in 100% of subjects, but after setting the analysis to 5- and 10-fold cut-off levels, the percentage of subjects meeting this criterion was significantly higher for anti-S-RBD. The 100-fold cut-off level was achieved by only 21% and 16% for anti-S and anti-S-RBD, respectively. Anti-S and anti-S-RBD levels above ten times the positive cut-off were respectively observed in 91% and 100% individuals with a history of COVID-19, while among those without COVID-19, these values were 64% and 90%, respectively. Significantly higher incidence of values above 10 and 100 times the cut-off became apparent among people with a history of COVID-19. In conclusion, vaccination against COVID-19 following infection with the disease provides higher levels of specific antibodies 6 months after vaccination than those of individuals without a history of the disease, which supports the use of a booster dose, particularly for those who have not experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“…This case series study was conducted from July 1, 2021, to August 5, 2021. A fourth dose of the messenger RNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) was given to the 37 solid organ transplant recipients, including 5 (13.5%) who had a weak response to the previous 3 doses (antibody concentration <14 binding antibody units [BAU]/mL) 4 and 31 (83.8%) who had no response to the 3 previous doses. All participants provided oral informed consent and received approval of the medical staff ( Table ).…”
This case series study assesses whether a fourth dose of a SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccine is associated with improved anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in solid organ transplant recipients in France.
“…We read with interest the article by Dimeglio et al 1 , showing the importance of the SARS-CoV-2 anti-S antibody response. Along with previous results showing a strong decrease of antibody and neutralization titers after vaccination 2,3 , especially for Gamma variant, their results highlight the usefulness of assessing antibody levels among HealthCare Workers (HCWs) and to monitor the effects of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.